Party CFO conversation: Trip report
 

An anonymous 2+2er friend of mine just got off the phone with Party's CFO. Here's what he had to say:

-PartyPoker regards the high-volume, serious gambler as an acceptable, but sub-optimal customer. They see their future growth primarily in terms of the new casino platform they're launching - they want the recreational gamblers playing blackjack, roulette, etc.

-Party split from its skins precisely because of its plans for a full-scale casino platform. They couldn't put the skins' customers on the casino platform for whatever reason, and for some reason, keeping casino players in the poker network is too difficult. (Sorry for the vagueness; he was pretty tight-lipped throughout.) As such, they have chosen this time to start regarding the skins not as partners, but as competitors.

-Party is genuinely surprised by the negative market reaction. They thought their obvious genius would be a big hit today. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

-Party is not ruling out rakeback, but has no immediate plans. I don't know how that jibes with the affiliates' impression that this will all be resolved successfully within the next few days.


That's pretty much it.

In short: My impression, along with the impressions of a lot of other people, I guess, was that Party regards us primarily as a hassle, and that they see their business model as catering to an ever-rotating group of recreational gamblers. This conversation would seem to strengthen that impression.

(BTW: I know literally nothing else. Please do not PM me to hit me up for secrets that I don't have.)

Re: Party CFO conversation: Trip report
 

So basically they are deciding that their highest volume customers are behind the low volume ones?

Preferring to focus on the dwindling stream of new gamboolers that will dump in a casino rather than on a poker table?


Great.

Wonder what will happen to starluck.


Thank you for the post and information.

Re: Party CFO conversation: Trip report
 

Nice input.

Re: Party CFO conversation: Trip report
 

I don't see why they don't realize that if all the "pros" left, the next best chunk of players would start to win all the money. Many of them would realize how much money they are making, and decide to "turn pro" themselves. Because poker is a game with a range of skills, not just simply "sharks" and "fish", it is an inevitability that there will be winning players who take money from the crappier players and take it out of circulation.

Re: Party CFO conversation: Trip report
 

Right. These guys seem to have a really poor grasp of the nature of professional gambling from a player's perspective. Don't they have consultants for these things?

Re: Party CFO conversation: Trip report
 

[ QUOTE ]
I don't see why they don't realize that if all the "pros" left, the next best chunk of players would start to win all the money.

[/ QUOTE ]

maybe thats why they dont care about the "pros", because they will always be there. If all of twoplustwo leaves, then a new bunch will spring up with "should i go pro questions".
I guess this makes sense, If one group of pros is always going to be replaced by the next, why cater to it?
what you really need is fresh money coming in

Re: Party CFO conversation: Trip report
 

It seems to me that some stability is preferable to constant turnover in one's customer base, esp. when you'd be giving up next to nothing.

Maybe I'm just weak-tight?

Re: Party CFO conversation: Trip report
 

it's not about fresh money coming in

they make their money on rake, so all that matters is the number of games/hands being played at a time for what average stakes...

the more games/hands/higher stakes, the more rake they collect

if u sit 10 people at a table with $100 each, eventually pp would have all 1k of the money if u all sat there and played long enough...

Re: Party CFO conversation: Trip report
 

[ QUOTE ]
So basically they are deciding that their highest volume customers are behind the low volume ones?

[/ QUOTE ]

High volume, but also much lower margin because they play through skins.

Re: Party CFO conversation: Trip report
 

"My impression, along with the impressions of a lot of other people, I guess, was that Party regards us primarily as a hassle, and that they see their business model as catering to an ever-rotating group of recreational gamblers. "

Makes perfect sense to me. 8-tablers are not good customers. As time goes by Party, and others, will realize that pros are sucking a lot of earn away from the sites.