which has weaker players at NL50?
in full ring.
|
Re: which has weaker players at NL50?
I would say full tilt. But there are a lot of annoying short-stacks, even up to the 200 level.
|
Re: which has weaker players at NL50?
It depends on what you mean by "weaker." I think that UB's players are more weak/tight, FT's are more LAG.
|
Re: which has weaker players at NL50?
Dunno, FT players are tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight in my experience, too many bonus whores, but I havent played there in about 6 months.
|
Re: which has weaker players at NL50?
People are literally giving their money away at FullTilt, commiting their whole stack with top pair etc.
|
Re: which has weaker players at NL50?
i think ub is easier
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.