Standard? 33 #2
 

***** Hand History for Game 3258017572 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $30 Buy-in + $3 Entry Fee Trny:18580688 Level:6 Blinds(100/200) - Sunday, December 25, 05:10:00 EDT 2005
Table Table 66994 (Real Money)
Seat 9 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 1: antiseen ( $870 )
Seat 2: lighthenge ( $905 )
Seat 3: The__Shiznit ( $1365 )
Seat 4: papag0rgi0 ( $1475 )
Seat 7: anika222 ( $850 )
Seat 9: amberman11 ( $2535 )
Trny:18580688 Level:6
Blinds(100/200)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to papag0rgi0 [ Th As ]
The__Shiznit folds.
$1.5 MILLION SCRATCHCARD PROMO!
Win up to $100, a laptop, a digital camera, DVD and MP3 players! From now until January 01, 2006!
papag0rgi0 is all-In [1475]
anika222 is all-In [850]
amberman11 folds.
antiseen folds.
lighthenge folds.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 3c, 7c, 8c ]
** Dealing Turn ** [ 4s ]
** Dealing River ** [ 7d ]

Re: Standard? 33 #2
 

sngpt says its good...

Re: Standard? 33 #2
 

Looks pretty standard to me

Re: Standard? 33 #2
 

im a beginner and im wondering why push like this...not questioning just want to understand if you dont mind?

Re: Standard? 33 #2
 

Several Reasons:
Not enough chips to play effectively post flop.
Blinds are a significant % of your stack size, and stealing them will increase your stack and effective expected value on later hands.
You risk being blinded out by not taking gambles such as this with semi-strong hands.

Re: Standard? 33 #2
 

[ QUOTE ]
im a beginner and im wondering why push like this...not questioning just want to understand if you dont mind?

[/ QUOTE ]

Google for Sit&Go Power tools, download the free version and read the tutorial, then concider buying it if you can spare the $. Great stuff.

Re: Standard? 33 #2
 

arite thanks for the advice

Re: Standard? 33 #2
 

But basically to summarise, it's a program that'll let you evaluate whether going allin preflop is right or not. It calculates your chances of winning vs. ranges of hands that other people will call you with. That's simplfying it a bit, but the tutorial will help you out there.

Re: Standard? 33 #2
 

[ QUOTE ]
sngpt says its good...

[/ QUOTE ]

No it doesn't. You mean, 'I ran some calling ranges in SNGPT and I feel this push is solid based on my analysis.'

SNGPT 'says' nothing in terms of correct/incorrect play....it just crunches #s based on an ICM equity model and opponent specific information that you plug in. It just so happens that in this scenario you can't really find any non-ridiculous calling ranges that make the push -EV....

OP,
Yes, this push looks good.

Yugoslav

Re: Standard? 33 #2
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
sngpt says its good...

[/ QUOTE ]

No it doesn't. You mean, 'I ran some calling ranges in SNGPT and I feel this push is solid based on my analysis.'

SNGPT 'says' nothing in terms of correct/incorrect play....it just crunches #s based on an ICM equity model and opponent specific information that you plug in. It just so happens that in this scenario you can't really find any non-ridiculous calling ranges that make the push -EV....

OP,
Yes, this push looks good.

Yugoslav

[/ QUOTE ]



Dear Yugp,

Merry Xmas. You are a douche.

Love,
Beef

ps. you are gay too.