KK (couldn\'t think of a snazzy title)
 

just sat down no real reads.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $6 BB (9 handed)

saw flop|<font color="C00000">saw showdown</font>

<font color="C00000">Hero ($546)</font>
CO ($394.60)
Button ($621)
SB ($146.95)
BB ($1176.70)
<font color="C00000">UTG ($677.30)</font>
UTG+1 ($143.30)
MP1 ($782.55)
MP2 ($1236.30)

Preflop: Hero is MP3 with K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
UTG calls $6, UTG+1 folds, MP1 folds, MP2 calls $6, <font color="CC3333">Hero raises to $30</font>, CO folds, Button folds, SB folds, BB folds, UTG calls $24, MP2 folds.

Flop: ($75) 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(2 players)</font>
UTG checks, <font color="CC3333">Hero bets $70</font>, <font color="CC3333">UTG raises to $252</font>, Hero calls $182.

Turn: ($579) J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(2 players)</font>
<font color="CC3333">UTG bets $395.3 (All-In)</font>, Hero calls $264 (All-In).

River: ($1238.30) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="blue">(2 players, 2 all-in)</font>

Final Pot: $1238.30
<font color="green">Main Pot: $1107, between Hero and UTG.</font>
<font color="green">Pot 2: $131.30, returned to UTG.</font>

Re: KK (couldn\'t think of a snazzy title)
 

He's obviously got an overpair or a set. AA/QQ imo.

Re: KK (couldn\'t think of a snazzy title)
 

there is a pretty big difference in him having an overpair vs a set don't you think?
and you don't think he'd make this play w/9-9 --- QQ?
and how bout AQ hearts?
all in all i didn't find your post very helpful.

Re: KK (couldn\'t think of a snazzy title)
 

Seems like a set played really straight-forward to me- utg limp, call raise, check-raise flop, turn all in...

Do you think he would limp UTG w/ AQs and cr the flop? I don't play in this game so I don't know if that is a common line.

Re: KK (couldn\'t think of a snazzy title)
 

I'd put him on a set or AA.
You put in a raise preflop and then made a good bet on the flop. There is no way he put you on a set with that flop.
He put you on QQ-AA not any lower.
His reraise signals real strength since u raised preflop and put in a decent bet on the flop.

Either AA limp or a set. Since first in I'd put him on 77 or maybe 44.

Re: KK (couldn\'t think of a snazzy title)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Do you think he would limp UTG w/ AQs and cr the flop?

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, AQs cr is overplaying here, maybe he thinks he has 2 overcards...

Looks like Aces to me!?

Re: KK (couldn\'t think of a snazzy title)
 

I think he's got you beat thats what I mean.
Limps UTG, call raise, check-raise flop, turn all in.

Re: KK (couldn\'t think of a snazzy title)
 

I don't think he had a set - his check/raise on the flop I think is an attempt to get to the river for cheap with a flush draw. With the flopped set I think he would have waited until the turn to get significant money in the pot. (primarily because your bet is unlikely to signal a flush draw, so why should he bother scaring you away). When he bets out on the turn he has likely made a weak hand but has a re-draw to a better hand. I would not be surprised if he had A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].

AA/QQ are pretty unlikely based on the pre-flop action. I think a limp-reraise would have occurred. But we don't know if he is tricky and playing AA this way. JJ is a real possibility though.

-Ash

Re: KK (couldn\'t think of a snazzy title)
 

[ QUOTE ]
I think he's got you beat thats what I mean.
Limps UTG, call raise, check-raise flop, turn all in.

[/ QUOTE ]Oh god, you said the exact same thing you said last time, this time including a recap of the action, which happens to be exactly what someone else said earlier in the thread.

Re: KK (couldn\'t think of a snazzy title)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think he's got you beat thats what I mean.
Limps UTG, call raise, check-raise flop, turn all in.

[/ QUOTE ]Oh god, you said the exact same thing you said last time, this time including a recap of the action, which happens to be exactly what someone else said earlier in the thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

OH Im so sorry for sharing MY opinion. Of course I said the same thing as the previous post but this time I wanted to CLARIFY what I meant for those who didnt get it.

Don't flame opinions contribute with your own instead of ruining others.
Said earlier in the thread? I was the first one to reply..