Please tell me how my pokertracker stats look, for ss
 

I know I haven't played enough hands to get a true reading, but can someone just comment how these stats look so far, keeping in mind I primarily play 2/4 at pokerstars?
(I've posted the same question at pokertracker forum, but just hoping to get some more responses.)

VPIP: 17.38
VPIP from sb: 38.01
Folded sb to steal: 76
Folded bb to steal: 88.24
Att to steal blinds: 21.37
Won at WSF: 33.63
Went to sd: 26.35
Won at sd: 55.28
PF raise: 5.79
Aggression factor: 2.69 (not including preflop)
Aggression factor: 1.32 (including preflop)

Re: Please tell me how my pokertracker stats look, for ss
 

[ QUOTE ]
I know I haven't played enough hands to get a true reading

[/ QUOTE ]
I'd prefer an actual number here. Let the forum be the judge of this.

[ QUOTE ]
PF raise: 5.79

[/ QUOTE ]
Not enough. Mine is 9% and I'm considered conservative around here. Research the many posts in this forum where preflop raising standards are discussed.

Re: Please tell me how my pokertracker stats look, for ss
 

I've only entered 5,450 hands right now. And my understanding is that you need 10-20,000 to get meaningful readings. But I was just anxious for feedback. Thanks.

Re: Please tell me how my pokertracker stats look, for ss
 

You need more hands to get an accurate read of your win rate. But a lot of the other statistics converge to a fairly accurate number quickly.

I agree with stellar wind though, you could be raising more frequently.

Re: Please tell me how my pokertracker stats look, for ss
 

Thanks, this is very helpful.

One quick additional question. I was under the impression that my overall aggression number was ok. Since it seems I should be raising more preflop, does this mean that I appear overly aggressive post-flop, or adequately aggressive post-flop? Or am I just misinterpreting these numbers?

Re: Please tell me how my pokertracker stats look, for ss
 

Since it seems I should be raising more preflop, does this mean that I appear overly aggressive post-flop, or adequately aggressive post-flop? Or am I just misinterpreting these numbers?

I don't know, so much of this depends on circumstances, opponents, what hands you have been playing, etc.. I think that the best way to try and figure this out is to post some hands where you might have been more aggressive, or maybe some hands where you might be less aggressive, and try and figure things out.

You play fairly tightly, so that might mean that postflop, you have a better hand a lot of the time, so your play looks more aggressive, but it really isn't, because you just have a higher percentage of hands that you can legitimately value bet. Or something else. Like I said, its hard to divine from the tea leaves of statistics.