#\'s check
 

Couple of #'s I have for 100NL just wondering if these look ok

VPIP 23.9%
Att. to steal blinds 26.4%
Won $ WSF% 39.7%
Went to SD 17%
Won $ at SD 44%
PFR 13.3%

What worries me is the 44% W$SD rate...let me know if these #'s look ok and what I could do to fix them

Re: #\'s check
 

6max or full ring? Sample size?

Re: #\'s check
 

You see the showdown less often than I do, but you also win the showdown less often than I do. That can't be good.

Do you stab at a lot of pots, especially on the river?

Re: #\'s check
 

What are good numbers for won at showdown? I know they're supposed to be 51%-59% in limit, but it's should be higher in NL no?

Re: #\'s check
 

6 max examples, i think i'm calling to many river bets which is kinda my concern, just seeing if anybody else's # was about the same

Re: #\'s check
 

Mine is in the upper fifties. As far as I know that is good.

Re: #\'s check
 

I am also wondering what is a good W$SD rate... running around 48% myself but I wish there was a way to rate it based on the dollar value of the hand. For example if you win a $100 at SD vs. losing a hand where you checked down bb vs. sb for $0.75. W$SD is 50% but the only thing I care about is the % of big pots I win.

Any way to filter for pot size and then see what the W$SD ratio is then?

Guin

Re: #\'s check
 

Sample size? The 17 and the 44 seem unlikely partners -- have you played enough hands to be confident of these numbers?

Re: #\'s check
 

How many hands? Tell me so I can tell you your sample size is too small

Re: #\'s check
 

it all depends on the style of your play.. tighter players will have higher win at showdown im assuming
and aggressive players will win alot more hands before the showdown.. and only run into monsters so have a lower rate of showdown. etc. alot of factors that play into that statistic