Re: AK math problem. Call 28 w/ nothing to win 100?
 

I don't feel as though the shortstack will feel that I'm folding for $28 more, so I think that the $20 bet should be a lot scarier to most people than the all-in bet. The all-in bet just reeks of AK.

Ryan

Re: AK math problem. Call 28 w/ nothing to win 100?
 

[ QUOTE ]
I don't feel as though the shortstack will feel that I'm folding for $28 more, so I think that the $20 bet should be a lot scarier to most people than the all-in bet. The all-in bet just reeks of AK.

Ryan

[/ QUOTE ]

you raise pf, bet the flop, you can have a huge range of hands here that you'll fold for $30 more

Re: AK math problem. Call 28 w/ nothing to win 100?
 

Evidently not... I called with AK and I felt I had odds to do so.

[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: AK math problem. Call 28 w/ nothing to win 100?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Evidently not... I called with AK and I felt I had odds to do so.

[/ QUOTE ]

you do have the odds to do so, but that's because you manufactured the situation with your continuation bet. when you bet $20, you were actually committing $48. i disagree that $20 is scarier than putting him all-in.

Re: AK math problem. Call 28 w/ nothing to win 100?
 

I don't mind checking behind on the flop here.

Re: AK math problem. Call 28 w/ nothing to win 100?
 

I would not put him on a flush draw, i would say pocket pair or AQs. But since you he is low stacked, he might be bluffing or might have a pocket pair. If a A or K comes up on the turn or river, i think you got this. A call is not bad here.