Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=407057)

whitelime 12-29-2005 11:20 AM

10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
Villain in this hand is 32/6/2. Don't know enough to comment on his postflop play. My table image is pretty TAG.

Villain has $1091 to start and I cover. One limper. I make it $80 in the SB w/ A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. Villain calls from BB. Limper calls.

Flop A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]8 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]T [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

I bet $200. Villain minraises to $400. Limper folds. I call.

Turn is T [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

I check. Villain bets $300. I go all-in for $331 more.

Can anyone find a fold at any point in this hand or do you go broke here?

Assuming you call flop, is there any way you can fold this turn? It's probably the best card in the deck besides an A or K.

captZEEbo1 12-29-2005 11:37 AM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
if he flipped up AQ would you post this?

whitelime 12-29-2005 11:53 AM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
Probably not. Most of the hands I post, I lose the pot. Much more likely I made a mistake in a hand I lost than a hand I won.

flawless_victory 12-29-2005 11:57 AM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
cant remember the last time i folded AK on AT8 against a half stack, but this guy definitely played this hand in a way that makes possible... tough decision on the turn, i mean 300? are you kidding me?

Yeti 12-29-2005 11:59 AM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
flawless - I am just going to start underbetting against you and 1800gambler, as you seem so eager to check-fold everytime someone bets a goofy amount.

whitelime 12-29-2005 12:01 PM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
Doubt it changes much, but I forgot to mention this was 6 handed.

creedofhubris 12-29-2005 12:15 PM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
[ QUOTE ]
Villain in this hand is 32/6/2. Don't know enough to comment on his postflop play. My table image is pretty TAG.

Villain has $1091 to start and I cover. One limper. I make it $80 in the SB w/ A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. Villain calls from BB. Limper calls.

Flop A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]8 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]T [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

I bet $200. Villain minraises to $400. Limper folds. I call.

Turn is T [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]

I check. Villain bets $300. I go all-in for $331 more.

Can anyone find a fold at any point in this hand or do you go broke here?



[/ QUOTE ]

You can't go broke, you have him covered.

I've got no problem with putting him allin. Remember, if he were any good, he'd have a full stack.

But if he's a guy who only raises when he has two pair or better (and only minraises), take note for next time.

flawless_victory 12-29-2005 12:17 PM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
[ QUOTE ]
flawless - I am just going to start underbetting against you and 1800gambler, as you seem so eager to check-fold everytime someone bets a goofy amount.

[/ QUOTE ]
pot is 1K, he has 650 left and he bet 300. jesus.

SmileyEH 12-29-2005 12:33 PM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
Meh, if you doubled him up you'll just win it back anyway [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

-SmileyEH

ZeeJustin 12-29-2005 01:50 PM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
[ QUOTE ]
Remember, if he were any good, he'd have a full stack.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is not true. There are plenty of strategical advantages to having a short stack, and I've seen many good winning players play high stakes NL w/ min buyins.

PickyTooth 12-29-2005 01:54 PM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Remember, if he were any good, he'd have a full stack.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is not true. There are plenty of strategical advantages to having a short stack, and I've seen many good winning players play high stakes NL w/ min buyins.

[/ QUOTE ]

maybe, but they should all die horrible deaths anyways.

TheWorstPlayer 12-29-2005 01:56 PM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
Matt Flynn often buys short, apparently.

hit_the_set 12-29-2005 01:58 PM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
Playing short stacked probably has its own advantages.

Instead of bashing the short stacks, you should learn to adapt your play when you find one on your table. Nobody likes short stacks, but its a different kind of challenge/adjustment(just like you would adjust to a Maniac or fish at your table).

12-29-2005 01:59 PM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
Just because you lost a pot.. doesnt mean you played it wrong... Thats a great flop for AK..., i'd get my money in with it...

Alix 12-29-2005 02:39 PM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
playing a large stack is a dominated strategy.

The only problem with min buy-ins is that they also maximize the rake relative to played pot size.

I like 50BB, it's my confort zone...

Alix

whitelime 12-29-2005 04:34 PM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
It's true to the extent that to maximize your BB/100, assuming you are a winning player with 100BB stacks, you would reload every time your stack fell below the max.

I find your post so typical. If you take 100 NL players and 100 Limit players, I guarantee the majority of NL players will say NL is the more difficult/challenging/skill intensive/etc. game, while the majority of Limit players will defend limit. Similarly, you seem to be defending tourney players.

ZeeJustin 12-29-2005 08:45 PM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
[ QUOTE ]
It's true to the extent that to maximize your BB/100, assuming you are a winning player with 100BB stacks, you would reload every time your stack fell below the max.

I find your post so typical. If you take 100 NL players and 100 Limit players, I guarantee the majority of NL players will say NL is the more difficult/challenging/skill intensive/etc. game, while the majority of Limit players will defend limit. Similarly, you seem to be defending tourney players.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not defending them at all. If anything I'm saying the opposite.

I agree that an EXPERT (not that I did not use the word "winning") player will earn more with deeper stacks, but a player with solid preflop standards and not much else will do better playing a short stack because of the ability to get all-in easier.

Also in aggressive games like the UB 50/100, there is a lot to be said for buying in short to counter act the hyper-aggressive, but overall skilled play in that game.

If you think my opinion comes frmo being a tourney player, you are 100% wrong.

12-29-2005 11:21 PM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
[ QUOTE ]
playing a large stack is a dominated strategy.

[/ QUOTE ]

ummmm. . . . lol

P.S. whitelime. . hand is fine.

RikaKazak 12-30-2005 12:55 AM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
I 3 bet and push it in on flop, lots of draws possible, and if I do call a raise looking for a safe turn, I push at him not allowing a free card, and if I do ck this turn, and he bets the $300, I put him in just like you did.

octop 12-30-2005 01:59 AM

Re: 10/20NL, TPTK against a half stack
 
Playing short is a skill which most people who buy in short dont have
They generally suck. Then again most players suck.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.