Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   Another bottom set post (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=384012)

LetYouDown 11-23-2005 01:35 PM

Re: Another bottom set post
 
[ QUOTE ]
but youve got a full house...

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes, yes I do. I called because it's very possible he has a lone 7. I didn't raise because it's very possible that he has more than a lone 7.

11-23-2005 01:36 PM

Re: Another bottom set post
 
[ QUOTE ]

but youve got a full house...

[/ QUOTE ]

yes but 87, 88, 72 and 73 all have bigger full houses, which I suppose is the worry.

LetYouDown 11-23-2005 01:39 PM

Re: Another bottom set post
 
[ QUOTE ]
yes but 87, 88, 72 and 73 all have bigger full houses, which I suppose is the worry.

[/ QUOTE ]
Exactly. 8-8 didn't concern me, nor did 7-7. 8-7, 7-2 and 7-3 seemed like very realistic holdings, especially considering he's in the big blind and he's waking up forcefully on the river. At the time I honestly felt it was roughly a cointoss whether he had me or not.

I am absolutely not weak tight (esp. at micro limits), and I do realize that it can seem strange to not push here. I read him for at least a 7 and I had no further mechanism for determining his strength beyond the size of his bet.

beavens 11-23-2005 01:41 PM

Re: Another bottom set post
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
yes but 87, 88, 72 and 73 all have bigger full houses, which I suppose is the worry.

[/ QUOTE ]
Exactly. 8-8 didn't concern me, nor did 7-7. 8-7, 7-2 and 7-3 seemed like very realistic holdings, especially considering he's in the big blind and he's waking up forcefully on the river. At the time I honestly felt it was roughly a cointoss whether he had me or not.

[/ QUOTE ]

yes i see your concern, but i'm pretty sure he flips over the naked 7 and you take the pot.

but you probably played it safe, and right. nice post.

11-23-2005 02:46 PM

Re: Another bottom set post
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
At $25 NL, Its very likely he had an overpair like AA or KK here and has you on 8s.

[/ QUOTE ]
[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] He's checking A-A or K-K from the BB with a field in front of him? And I'm open-limping 8-8 from MP? Then he goes nuts on the river after I seemingly value bet him on the turn?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes
Play $25 NL and you'll won't go an hour with out seeing this.

They play AA like they flopped the nut boat. And are willing to put there stack in on the river, with a paired board, three to a flush... Its pretty amusing.

4_2_it 11-23-2005 02:58 PM

Re: Another bottom set post
 
He's pot committed by making that river bet. Put him all-in. If villain calls your flop raise with 27 and doesn't re-raise with 37 or 87 then why would he start betting the river? That 2 did not hurt you. 78 is the only holding I'm afraid of here.

LetYouDown 11-23-2005 03:11 PM

Re: Another bottom set post
 
[ QUOTE ]
78 is the only holding I'm afraid of here.

[/ QUOTE ]
That was my number one fear.

Riverman 11-23-2005 04:19 PM

Re: Another bottom set post
 
Not raising this river is criminal.

What did you put him on, and what was the basis for that read?

beavens 11-23-2005 04:20 PM

Re: Another bottom set post
 
[ QUOTE ]
Not raising this river is criminal.

What did you put him on, and what was the basis for that read?

[/ QUOTE ]

like the thread says, a naked 7 or MAYBE 78.

Hattifnatt 11-23-2005 04:26 PM

Re: Another bottom set post
 
Bet a little more on the turn, push river.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.