Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Mid-High Stakes Shorthanded (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=50)
-   -   10/20 Aggression #1 -AQs (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=402375)

StellarWind 12-20-2005 10:11 PM

10/20 Aggression #1 -AQs
 
10/20 6-max (5-handed)

Hero is UTG with A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

Preflop: Hero raises, BB calls.

BB is 26/16, Fold BB to steal 61%, TAG postflop.

Flop (4.5 SB): T [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets, BB checkraises, Hero calls.

Turn (4.2 BB) 9 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 players)
BB bets, Hero folds

wheelz 12-20-2005 10:13 PM

Re: 10/20 Aggression #1 -AQs
 
yep.

kahntrutahn 12-20-2005 10:14 PM

Re: 10/20 Aggression #1 -AQs
 
2 cards in his range fall, and the flush draw hits... I say good fold... though if he starts ChR and leading too many weak flops, I call down [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Wynton 12-20-2005 10:27 PM

Re: 10/20 Aggression #1 -AQs
 
I'm not even sure what the issue is. I play it exactly the same.

sweetjazz 12-20-2005 10:50 PM

Re: 10/20 Aggression #1 -AQs
 
I think this is completely standard. The interesting question is how frequently the BB would have to check-raise in this spot for a call-down to be correct. This is just a math problem (after some assumptions on his hand range preflop), and it might be interesting to work out (though I am sadly too lazy to do so now).

My guess is that BB would have to check-raise with a lot of hands here to make a call-down correct here. My first estimate would be 75%, though I could see anything from 60-90%.

Another interesting question is what turn cards we should play on with here.

Jeff W 12-20-2005 11:03 PM

Re: 10/20 Aggression #1 -AQs
 
Easy fold.

Congrats on the move to 10/20. You are one of the best posters on this site and your ennumerative style of posting and clear analysis was important to my development as a player back when I was at small stakes/micro limits.

Lmn55d 12-20-2005 11:41 PM

Re: 10/20 Aggression #1 -AQs
 
I'd play it the same. If the turn was a nonheart 9, does anyone think it is close?

Wynton 12-21-2005 08:34 AM

Re: 10/20 Aggression #1 -AQs
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'd play it the same. If the turn was a nonheart 9, does anyone think it is close?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that makes it much closer, but I still probably fold.

dave44 12-21-2005 09:27 AM

Re: 10/20 Aggression #1 -AQs
 
[ QUOTE ]
Easy fold.

Congrats on the move to 10/20. You are one of the best posters on this site and your ennumerative style of posting and clear analysis was important to my development as a player back when I was at small stakes/micro limits.

[/ QUOTE ]
I echo both of these statements.

12-21-2005 09:44 AM

Re: 10/20 Aggression #1 -AQs
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Easy fold.

Congrats on the move to 10/20. You are one of the best posters on this site and your ennumerative style of posting and clear analysis was important to my development as a player back when I was at small stakes/micro limits.

[/ QUOTE ]
I echo both of these statements.

[/ QUOTE ]
I've never really played much micro or smaller than 5/10, but I'd still like to echo the good things said about Stellar. He's up there with some of the best posters on the board.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.