Agree or Disagree? Why?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Not a single scientific discovery has ever disputed an important biblical fact.


[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Agree or Disagree? Why?
 

dis·pute
v. tr.

1. To argue about; debate.

----

Theory of evolution.

Re: Agree or Disagree? Why?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Not a single scientific discovery has ever disputed an important biblical fact.


[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Trick question. There are no important biblical facts. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Re: Agree or Disagree? Why?
 

The complete lack of empirical evidence for the existence of a soul, Heaven or Hell.

Re: Agree or Disagree? Why?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Not a single scientific discovery has ever disputed an important biblical fact.


[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Age of the earth.
Origin of man.

Re: Agree or Disagree? Why?
 

[ QUOTE ]
complete lack of empirical evidence for the existence of a soul, Heaven or Hell.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think these qualify as "scientific discoveries"

Re: Agree or Disagree? Why?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Age of the earth.

[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Origin of man.

[/ QUOTE ]

To what extent are these scientific discoveries as opposed to scientific theories? And to what extent do they dispute an important biblical fact?

Re: Agree or Disagree? Why?
 

[ QUOTE ]
And to what extent do they dispute an important biblical fact?

[/ QUOTE ]

Perhaps you should start by listing the top 10 or so "important biblical facts".

Re: Agree or Disagree? Why?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Not a single scientific discovery has ever disputed an important biblical fact.


[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

That may well be true, how about biblical fantasies though?

Re: Agree or Disagree? Why?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
complete lack of empirical evidence for the existence of a soul, Heaven or Hell.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think these qualify as "scientific discoveries"

[/ QUOTE ]

No, but the apparent absence of their existence, and complete lack of evidence or reason to suspect their existence should mean something to intelligent minds.