Inconsistent censorship
 

If there's going to be censorship here, it should be consistent. And in that case, the entire zoo should be shut down.

For example some moderator locked a thread about the 60's. I posted a quesion asking why. He deleted the post and emailed me a short reply "because of crap posts".

Well, there are many crap posts in the zoo, as well as other forums (such as necrophelia posts...).

I guess the power to censor--I mean moderate entitles the powerholders to use questionable subjectivity.

Re: Inconsistent censorship
 

*