Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   100/200 vs walkover (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=361664)

ALL1N 10-20-2005 12:59 PM

100/200 vs walkover
 
100/200 Crypto

From what I've seen, this guy is fairly solid. Nothing interesting had happened with him until this coldcall. My image is probably loose and somewhat donkish, and I suppose this is relevant cos haven't played that many hands vs him.

I open AThh in the CO, and walkover coldcalls right behind. Blinds fold.

Flop 8s7s6s. I check. Thoughts??

stoxtrader 10-20-2005 01:14 PM

Re: 100/200 vs walkover
 
checking seems like giving up to me. Cause my next action would be to fold.

I would lead this flop.

spoohunter 10-20-2005 02:18 PM

Re: 100/200 vs walkover
 
Any two cards over 10 probably muck to a flop bet, minus maybe AK and AQ. That's alot of combos to get rid of.

ggbman 10-20-2005 02:20 PM

Re: 100/200 vs walkover
 
I think getting like 5.5 to 1 on an immidiate bet, this is a must bet since he has to muck all paint cards without spades. If you check, its hard to play the rest of the hand.

JacksonTens 10-20-2005 08:35 PM

Re: 100/200 vs walkover
 
First thoughts.... Yay someone else lives in Melbourne.

Second thoughts.... Well you could bet the flop, but that is just so standard a good player will see right through it, in many cases I think your behind as his cold call could be a better A or high PP, but surely he'd 3bet with these.he may or may not have [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] in which case you could push him off a draw later. But its tough. If he's weak. I'll bet the flop, bet the turn. Fold to a raise, unless you feel he bluffs colour boards. Alii in all I don't think AT wins many showdowns and your A's are a little tainted... I'm rambling, bugger it. I think you get what I'm gettin at.

JT [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

Jeffage 10-20-2005 08:52 PM

Re: 100/200 vs walkover
 
Bet because you may take it down now or on the turn and the hand will be much easier to play. If I'm that guy and see you check fold in the spot often when rags flop, you are going to have a problem.

Jeff

TStoneMBD 10-21-2005 08:39 AM

Re: 100/200 vs walkover
 
were you planning on checkfolding or calling down?

does anyone have any thoughts on what walkovers coldcalling range is here and what hands of those will he fold the flop? if hes going to peel the flop with an exceptional amount of hands i would rather just checkfold as following through on the turn cant be good and he will take the pot away from you.

phish 10-21-2005 10:03 AM

Re: 100/200 vs walkover
 
[ QUOTE ]
were you planning on checkfolding or calling down?

does anyone have any thoughts on what walkovers coldcalling range is here and what hands of those will he fold the flop? if hes going to peel the flop with an exceptional amount of hands i would rather just checkfold as following through on the turn cant be good and he will take the pot away from you.

[/ QUOTE ]

Your mindset's all wrong. Don't play this game if you're going to think like that. If you intend to give up on every hand where you don't flop the nuts,...

exist 10-21-2005 10:11 AM

Re: 100/200 vs walkover
 
don't worry, TStoneMBD would definitely bet here. i think he's just trying to see if there's a situation where betting could be wrong.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.