Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Internet Gambling (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   10-Person Waitng Lists are Ridicurous (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=283646)

x2ski 06-30-2005 12:55 PM

10-Person Waitng Lists are Ridicurous
 
Now that Party has opened up 6-max pretty much across the board, the $3/$6-full game waiting lists are huge.

Why don't they open up more tables overall? Too much to keep track of or what?

Am I missing something?

No, I don't want to play 6-max at the moment.

coffeecrazy1 06-30-2005 01:08 PM

Re: 10-Person Waitng Lists are Ridicurous
 
The best I can figure...just because a table has 10 people waiting does not mean it does not have a seat open. What I guess is happening is that people are on the waitlist, then find a table, but the party software keeps them active on the list and they don't know about it. So...don't be bowled over by the waiting lists, necessarily.

Sand 06-30-2005 01:14 PM

Re: 10-Person Waitng Lists are Ridicurous
 
[ QUOTE ]
10-Person Waitng Lists are Ridicurous

[/ QUOTE ]

Scooby-Doo?

hurlyburly 06-30-2005 01:29 PM

Re: 10-Person Waitng Lists are Ridicurous
 
That's almost as irritating as having 6-max Stud. Why in the hell do they need 6-max stud?!?!?

x2ski 06-30-2005 02:17 PM

Re: 10-Person Waitng Lists are Ridicurous
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
10-Person Waitng Lists are Ridicurous

[/ QUOTE ]

Scooby-Doo?

[/ QUOTE ]

Seinfeld

gojacketz 06-30-2005 03:42 PM

Re: 10-Person Waitng Lists are Ridicurous
 
Did you say ridicurous?

slickpoppa 06-30-2005 03:50 PM

Re: 10-Person Waitng Lists are Ridicurous
 
I'm just speculating, but I think they don't open more tables because opening more tables increases the chances of tables breaking up, which annoys many people. Also, remember that many people put their names down on several waiting lists and only play on one table. So if you have 10 tables with 10 on each waiting list, that does not mean that there are necessarily 100 people waiting 10 tables.

mosquito 06-30-2005 03:55 PM

Re: 10-Person Waitng Lists are Ridicurous
 
[ QUOTE ]
That's almost as irritating as having 6-max Stud. Why in the hell do they need 6-max stud?!?!?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's TRUE!!! 6 max stud..... HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

x2ski 06-30-2005 05:50 PM

Re: 10-Person Waitng Lists are Ridicurous
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'm just speculating, but I think they don't open more tables because opening more tables increases the chances of tables breaking up, which annoys many people. Also, remember that many people put their names down on several waiting lists and only play on one table. So if you have 10 tables with 10 on each waiting list, that does not mean that there are necessarily 100 people waiting 10 tables.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're right, and it doesn't take too long to get on tables... but still, it's a drastic change

bigredlemon 06-30-2005 07:31 PM

Re: 10-Person Waitng Lists are Ridicurous
 
[ QUOTE ]
That's almost as irritating as having 6-max Stud. Why in the hell do they need 6-max stud?!?!?

[/ QUOTE ]Don't knock it until you try it [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.