royal #3
 

http://www.pokerhand.org/index.php?p...mp;hand=184542

Barron

Re: royal #3
 

1. Why no 3-bet preflop from the SB? ATs seems like it will play better this way than 3-handed.

2. Too bad the river didnt pair the board.

Re: royal #3
 

sob. I still have not yet hit a royal.

oh, nh by the way.

Re: royal #3
 

[ QUOTE ]
1. Why no 3-bet preflop from the SB? ATs seems like it will play better this way than 3-handed.

2. Too bad the river didnt pair the board.

[/ QUOTE ]

no read on MP. if MP doesn't raise very light i typically call ATs from bb.

id rather not talk strategy on this bad beeeeeeeeeeeeeetzzzzzzzzzzz forum, but my personal style involves much c'ring.

Barron

Re: royal #3
 

if only the last Q came on the river.

Re: royal #3
 

[ QUOTE ]
if only the last Q came on the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

after he called my c'r i was PRAYING for the board to pair

Barron

Re: royal #3
 

but then you would only be pissed off its a 4bet cap at ps.

Re: royal #3
 

[ QUOTE ]
but then you would only be pissed off its a 4bet cap at ps.

[/ QUOTE ]

true but id accept it as my fault for playin there lol...id more be pissed a) it wasn't at ameristar and i wasn't playing 3/6 or 5/10 (like i frequently do hahahha) or b) it wasn't at 100/200 inter no cap

Barron

Re: royal #3
 

I've never had a royal flush in texas holdem.

Re: royal #3
 

[ QUOTE ]
I've never had a royal flush in texas holdem.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have had 5 that I can recall. 3 on stars, 1 on Party, 1 at the Borgata.