Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   limp-reraised by MajorPolk (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=407428)

curtains 12-29-2005 10:43 PM

limp-reraised by MajorPolk
 
MajorPolk is a regular 8 tabler at the $215s:

***** Hand History for Game 3278756023 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $200 Buy-in + $15 Entry Fee Trny:18697259 Level:3 Blinds(25/50) - Thursday, December 29, 01:49:36 EDT 2005
Table Table 68768 (Real Money)
Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: TheSeed69 ( $720 )
Seat 2: Voodoo_88 ( $1115 )
Seat 3: curtains ( $770 )
Seat 4: ComeOnPhish ( $1195 )
Seat 5: Theboundbook ( $2103 )
Seat 7: weaklooose ( $885 )
Seat 8: chillabrand ( $852 )
Seat 9: MajorPolk ( $925 )
Seat 10: dkimp ( $1435 )
Trny:18697259 Level:3
Blinds(25/50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to curtains [ Qd Ad ]
2 folds
MajorPolk calls [50].
5 folds
curtains raises to [175]
MajorPolk is all-In.
curtains ?

lastchance 12-29-2005 10:47 PM

Re: limp-reraised by MajorPolk
 
Whaa? Clean up action please.

microbet 12-29-2005 10:50 PM

Re: limp-reraised by MajorPolk
 
Your missing your first raise to ?, 150 ? 175 ?

Scuba Chuck 12-29-2005 11:01 PM

Re: limp-reraised by MajorPolk
 

[ QUOTE ]
MajorPolk is a regular 8 tabler at the $215s:


[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Dealt to curtains [ Qd Ad ]
2 folds
MajorPolk calls [50].
5 folds
MajorPolk is all-In.
curtains ?

[/ QUOTE ]

Does this mean he's really a 4 tabler?

johnnybeef 12-29-2005 11:09 PM

Re: limp-reraised by MajorPolk
 
Good fold. He is likely doing this with 99 or KJ some of the time considering that you two likely play together enough. But, he won't be doing it often enough for you to make calling a viable option.

curtains 12-29-2005 11:13 PM

Re: limp-reraised by MajorPolk
 
fixed it, sorry.

curtains 12-30-2005 06:52 AM

Re: limp-reraised by MajorPolk
 

I called, he had 99. These two limpreraise hands werent too exciting, I just wanted to show the amount of abuse you are allowing yourself by constantly folding to these limpreraises. Maybe Im just fortunate that they never have AA-KK when I do decide to call, but you cant just let someone steal 1/4th of your stack because they "must have AA or KK". A lot of these guys don't play AA+KK like that because its "too obvious" and they save their somewhat weaker hands for the limp reraises.

Marnixvdb 12-30-2005 07:27 AM

Re: limp-reraised by MajorPolk
 
The limp/reraise is a very attractive option for him with his stack for the medium pocket pairs. A normal raise can get him in trouble when called, and seeing the flop in a limped pot is ok for him. Reraising a raise gives him great FE and he will often still have the best hand when called. Also he can still fold if very heavy action develops behind him.

I'd sooner expect a regular to know that than a beginner, so I'd def. call against a regular.

Taraz 12-30-2005 09:02 AM

Re: limp-reraised by MajorPolk
 
It's 5am, so it might just be the tiredness talking, but: it seems like you made these limp reraise posts to get the message to regulars, "stop limp reraising me you [censored]! I just might call with something you don't expect."

curtains 12-30-2005 12:52 PM

Re: limp-reraised by MajorPolk
 

hehe that and they dont always have AA-KK


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.