TAGs seem to be losing
 

http://img334.imageshack.us/img334/3...11822446az.jpg

4th day at 1/2 not a winning TAG among them. Is there even a point to using Bison rules anymore? Dont know if this is because of very small sample size or maybe those myths about 1/2 are right.

Re: TAGs seem to be losing
 

omg the biggest sample is 118hands

worthless post

and most of them look to be TP rather than TA

Re: TAGs seem to be losing
 

smiley face > moneybag > eagle

TAG is overrated

Re: TAGs seem to be losing
 

Worthless sample.

Don't know what rules you use, but most eagles are TA-neutral, not TAGs.

And auto-rate is not gospel. I've got plenty of moneybags in my DB who can't play postflop worth a dang.

Re: TAGs seem to be losing
 

[ QUOTE ]
smiley face > moneybag >



[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously?

Re: TAGs seem to be losing
 

This is silly. Even less empirically sound than cross-country growth regressions.

Re: TAGs seem to be losing
 

conclusive rebutal ; )

http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/6366/tags7tu.jpg

Re: TAGs seem to be losing
 

sample size, bla bla bla

and, more importantly

good stats != good player

Re: TAGs seem to be losing
 

[ QUOTE ]
smiley face > moneybag > eagle

TAG is overrated

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree 100%. As soon I realized that PF isn't the end-all, be-all of the hand and postflop is, my VPIP inched up out of moneybags range. There's no way I could play that tight now.

The original bison rules are, IMO, way off from optimal poker. I've been a smiley face for many tens of thousands of hands. Never going back.

If the dudes the OP were to post thier stats, there would probably be a resounding chorus of "you're way too tight."

Re: TAGs seem to be losing
 

So being loose preflop is +ev?