Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   No pot control in this one (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=339542)

tpir90036 09-18-2005 07:07 PM

No pot control in this one
 
Here is a hand I played and my thoughts. Let me know if I am a moron:

5/10 NL 8-handed.
Aggressive opponent ($1300) opens in MP to $40. I ($950) call on the button with 66. Blinds fold.

Flop ($95): K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]T [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]3 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
Opponent bets $80, I make it $240....

My thoughts. Opponent is the type to fire the second barrel here a lot if I just call. I might have the best hand and can stop him from hitting an overcard to my 6's. There are a lot of broadway gutshots he could have. He is not a lunatic and might fold hands like 99.

Stupid? Building a big pot with a marginal hand is horrible? Obvious I am weak because I probably might actually play a stronger hand more slowly?

Thanks,
tpir

Ulysses 09-18-2005 07:12 PM

Re: No pot control in this one
 
[ QUOTE ]
He is not a lunatic and might fold hands like 99.

[/ QUOTE ]

Might?

[ QUOTE ]
Building a big pot with a marginal hand is horrible?

[/ QUOTE ]

You are not building a pot here,you are hoping to take it down.

Hattifnatt 09-18-2005 07:13 PM

Re: No pot control in this one
 
Feels like its better to just give up here and wait for a better spot.

Rolen 09-18-2005 07:17 PM

Re: No pot control in this one
 
I'd say you need a pretty good reason to deviate from the standard bet/fold or check/fold here. I don't think you've got one.

tpir90036 09-18-2005 07:20 PM

Re: No pot control in this one
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'd say you need a pretty good reason to deviate from the standard bet/fold or check/fold here. I don't think you've got one.

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think I get what you are saying.

fsuplayer 09-18-2005 07:24 PM

Re: No pot control in this one
 
i like this play alot better with just one broadway card.

make it a Q82 type flop and I like it alot.

as it is, i think you prob. get called more than you would like to here.

tpir90036 09-18-2005 07:30 PM

Re: No pot control in this one
 
[ QUOTE ]
i like this play alot better with just one broadway card.

make it a Q82 type flop and I like it alot.

as it is, i think you prob. get called more than you would like to here.

[/ QUOTE ]
OK, the problem is that I would never play a hand like AQ like this. I am exploitable if someone catches on. It's either weakness or a monster.....and monsters are hard to come by. That can't be good.

Rolen 09-18-2005 07:34 PM

Re: No pot control in this one
 
Well, against an opponent you know will make a continuation bet most of the of the time in this situation whether he misses or not, and you know he will lay down stuff like AT and 99 to your bet, this is a worthwhile move. If not, it's not.

Alexthegreat 09-18-2005 08:08 PM

Re: No pot control in this one
 


[/ QUOTE ]
I am exploitable if someone catches on.

[/ QUOTE ]


This sounds like a problem....I'm not experienced enough to tell you exactly what to do to avoid being predictable, but taking different lines with standard, mundane hands is a good place to start I think....

flawless_victory 09-18-2005 08:22 PM

Re: No pot control in this one
 
wait... do you play limit?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.