Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   6 Max SNG's (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=402979)

tewall 12-21-2005 06:59 PM

6 Max SNG\'s
 
I looked for posts on this but couldn't find anything. Does anyone play these? Has there been discussions on the pros and cons of 6 max vs. full table?

Thanks.

12-21-2005 07:11 PM

Re: 6 Max SNG\'s
 
I play 6 max regularly, but I play them at pacific poker where they pay out top 3 instead of top 2. This greatly reduces variance.

johnny005 12-21-2005 08:20 PM

Re: 6 Max SNG\'s
 
IT also greatly reduces profit for a good player. Though you can probably still make more per hour on either of them cause they take less time to play... but if your 8 tabling full sng's.. Can you 8 table a shorthanded Sng. Its pretty hard even doing 3-4 of em and I used to do 8 tables of ful table.

12-21-2005 09:43 PM

Re: 6 Max SNG\'s
 
I have been specializing in Crypto's high-stakes 6-max(£130, £215, £320 buy-ins) SNGs they call Sixpaks. The main disadvantage is that they are high-maintenance -- while its relatively standard to play 6-8 table sets of full SNGs, I max out at about 3-4 of these at a time for optimal results. This cuts into hourly wage.

Another key aspect is the 75-25 payout structure. Superior heads-up game tactics are essential in this format. Most people do not focus on heads-up in SNGs, but 1st place is where the money is, and this is a very exploitable flaw if you can make proper adjustments well. They key is to make to heads-up - then you unleash all of the reads you accumulated. It is not as random as most people make it out to be - it can be random if you face a good HU player, but most SNGers suck at HU.

If the heads-up starts early (sometimes 1 guy will take the other 4 out at/before Level 4), you have a chance to probe your opponent for weakness, lie low until blinds get big, and then drop the hammer.

tjh 12-22-2005 02:32 AM

Re: 6 Max SNG\'s
 
I found the payout structure frustrating.

And actually looser play is rewarded so the fish play better by accident.

--
tjh

anacrime 12-22-2005 04:20 AM

Re: 6 Max SNG\'s
 
I don't like them. Six handed play forces you to widen your range and play poker against players who potentially don't know how to play poker. And, there is less dead money.

12-22-2005 04:46 AM

Re: 6 Max SNG\'s
 
Think about all the dead money in the 10 handed SNGs...

trainslayer 12-22-2005 05:25 AM

Re: 6 Max SNG\'s
 
preface: I don't multitable.

I have begun playing stars 12+1 6max exclusively.

I love em. Stay away. pleeze.

Mr_J 12-22-2005 05:33 AM

Re: 6 Max SNG\'s
 
[ QUOTE ]
Think about all the dead money in the HU SNGs...

[/ QUOTE ]

benfranklin 12-22-2005 01:39 PM

Re: 6 Max SNG\'s
 
[ QUOTE ]
play poker against players who potentially don't know how to play poker.

[/ QUOTE ]


And the bad thing about that is.............???

[ QUOTE ]
And, there is less dead money.

[/ QUOTE ]

In a 9 player Stars SnG, there are usually 5-6 players who are totally clueless. In a 6 player Stars SnG, there are usually 3-4 players who are totally clueless. A regular $10+1 and a $12+1/6 max pay about the same to the winner. So I figure about the same value in both.

The two main things that strike me about 6 max at Stars (the only place I have played them):

1. They take about the same time as a 9 player SnG, which seems like entirely too much time; and

2. 6 max players for some reason are much worse at HU play.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.