Re: [!@#$%]
 

[ QUOTE ]
We have five differences of opinion. We need at least a couple people to agree, then I'll change it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Put me down as a vote for [censored]. Primarily because I like to refer to him by typing just four choice letters. And because !@#$ looks too cartoony.

Re: [!@#$%]
 

i think [censored] is the best.

Re: [!@#$%]
 

[censored] i can't even [censored] [censored] make [censored] [censored] changes. [censored] well, [censored] [censored] [censored] [censored]

mat

Re: [!@#$%]
 

Either seems fine to me. But usually when something like !@#$% is used to replace a word the number of characters matches the word that is being censored.

That's not the case with [censored], so it has my vote.

Re: [!@#$%]
 

I like !@#$% but not [!@#$%]

I like it just 'cause it seems old time commicy, but then I can see why people wouldn't.

Or we could just replace all profanity with random text strings like "shimmering egg princess".

Re: [!@#$%]
 

[ QUOTE ]
[censored] i can't even [censored] [censored] make [censored] [censored] changes. [censored] well, [censored] [censored] [censored] [censored]

mat

[/ QUOTE ]

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

thanks for your vote of confidence guys & felicia

Re: [!@#$%]
 

[censored] imo.

Re: [!@#$%]
 

[censored] [!@#$%] i like [censored] too.

Re: [!@#$%]
 

what the [censored] is Cola an author of?

Keep it as [censored].

Re: [!@#$%]
 

test, [censored]