O_O
 

are players with these stats passive or aggressive?
player 1: 57/1.0/0.5
player 2: 43/5.5/0.8
player 3: 51/1.9/1.1

Re: O_O
 

Passive.

Re: O_O
 

Assuming that last number is post-flop aggression factor, isn't player 3 aggressive postflop? He's entering half the pots and still betting/raising more than he's calling postflop. That's pretty aggressive.

Re: O_O
 

perhaps...... out of the 50% of pots that he enters.. he folds the flop 80% of the time making him "somewhat passive"

or maybe out of the 50% of pots that he enters.. he folds 20% of the time making him a maniac.

the same could be said for player 2

Re: O_O
 

Yes, you are right. I over-generalized a bit. The third one isn't really passive postflop. I wouldn't really call him aggressive either though.

Re: O_O
 

player 1 and 3 are both passive preflop
player 2 seems to know what a decent raising hand is preflop

player 1 is definitely passive postflop and id like to say almost the same for player 2 and 3. 1.1 isnt much even if his vpip is 51.

Re: O_O
 

[ QUOTE ]
are players with these stats passive or aggressive?
player 1: 57/1.0/0.5
player 2: 43/5.5/0.8
player 3: 51/1.9/1.1

[/ QUOTE ]

1+3 are passive PF, 2 is neutral

AF's are sh*t IMO, I rely on notes I type to tell me if they are aggro postflop

Re: O_O
 

[ QUOTE ]
are players with these stats passive or aggressive?
player 1: 57/1.0/0.5
player 2: 43/5.5/0.8
player 3: 51/1.9/1.1

[/ QUOTE ]

Player 3 is somewhat aggressive postflop. The other two are passives.

Re: O_O
 

Note that if the third guy is capping the turn, he his 1.1 aggression does not mean he likely has a marginal hand. Remember that your AF needs to be about twice his.