Was This A Good or Bad Gigabet-Wannabe Play?
 

No major table reads, just got moved to this new table. $2 Tournament. 1200 started. 80 are left. I'm about 35thish and chips and confident I'm one of the Top 3 best players left in the tournament. I figured calling this bet doesn't really hurt my position too much, and it's a cheap shot to double up and knock out two guys. If I miss, I still feel good about my recovery chances. That in mind, what do you think of this play? Be honestly brutal if you must.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t1200 (9 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

Button (t5066)
SB (t6100)
Hero (t22492)
UTG (t37652)
UTG+1 (t24190)
MP1 (t6638)
MP2 (t39930)
MP3 (t6105)
CO (t31779)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">MP1 raises to t6563</font>, <font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, SB calls t5425 (All-In), Hero calls t5363.

Flop: (t17951) K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players, 1 all-in)</font>

Turn: (t17951) 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players, 1 all-in)</font>

River: (t17951) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players, 1 all-in)</font>

Final Pot: t17951

Results in white below: <font color="#FFFFFF">
SB has Jh Js (full house, jacks full of kings).
Hero has 4s 3c (two pair, kings and threes).
MP1 has 6d Ac (one pair, kings).
Outcome: SB wins t16764. Hero wins t1187. </font>

Thanks!

Re: Was This A Good or Bad Gigabet-Wannabe Play?
 

I don't think gig type plays apply to MTTs. They're mostly for image, in HIGHER buyins, and with somewhat better cards than the 2nd nut low. You had no erason to be in this hand. If you had raised on a steal with 92 or something it might be different, but this is just retarded.

Wow.

What the hell.

Re: Was This A Good or Bad Gigabet-Wannabe Play?
 

[ QUOTE ]
this is just retarded.


[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Was This A Good or Bad Gigabet-Wannabe Play?
 

Even with 3:1 odds against two players desperate to move all in?

Re: Was This A Good or Bad Gigabet-Wannabe Play?
 

uhh

you have one of the worst hands in poker

and you're going to play a three way all in with it for 25% of your stack? this play is horrible.

Re: Was This A Good or Bad Gigabet-Wannabe Play?
 

90% of time one of them has a overpair

Re: Was This A Good or Bad Gigabet-Wannabe Play?
 

[ QUOTE ]
80 are left. I'm about 35thish and chips and confident I'm one of the Top 3 best players left in the tournament.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Hero (t22492)
Hero is BB with 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
Hero calls t5363.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Be honestly brutal if you must.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Was This A Good or Bad Gigabet-Wannabe Play?
 

Hahaha, alright, alright. I get the idea. So I tried something new. Sue me. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Re: Was This A Good or Bad Gigabet-Wannabe Play?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Even with 3:1 odds against two players desperate to move all in?

[/ QUOTE ]

sorry, but I don't think 34 offsuit is better than a 3 to 1 dog against 2 players, one who most definitly has an overpair.

Re: Was This A Good or Bad Gigabet-Wannabe Play?
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'm about 35thish and chips and confident I'm one of the Top 3 best players left in the tournament.

[/ QUOTE ]

Out of curiosity how do you come up with his line??

Do you have notes on all 80 some odd players left? Have you played with all of them this tourney. Have you won this tourney a few times against this same field.

I can't see how you honestly think you are the best of 80 player left.

That being said how often do you think that 43x is suppossed to win vs. 2 all ins?

I think its a mistake to be soo.... cocky as to think you can play any two cards just because you think you are the best player left and can survive if you miss. Which by the way you will 80% of the time.