Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Other Other Topics (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=32)
-   -   Ghostbusters III (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=373558)

jnalpak 11-07-2005 02:21 PM

Ghostbusters III
 
so. BEN STILLER will star and this story now sucks!



still interested?


this was posted sunday...not sure i like the idea but a NY city in hell could be a good play. As a NY'er i always loved the franchise and thought it worked well, there is no need for them to go to a "5th dimension" and battle State Puff type monsters. Keep it all present day and it works so much better. IMO


I AIN'T 'FRAID OF NO GHOST

imported_The Vibesman 11-07-2005 02:26 PM

Re: Ghostbusters III
 
Ackroyd needs to come up with a better script than he and Landis did for Blues Brothers 2000, because he isn't going to have Sam Moore and James Brown around to stop people from caring how bad the movie is.

IndieMatty 11-07-2005 02:26 PM

Re: Ghostbusters III
 
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Ghostbusters 2 was bad enough.

God damnit.

pokerdirty 11-07-2005 02:29 PM

Re: Ghostbusters III
 
if you pay ~11 bucks to see this movie...



...YSSCKY

slickpoppa 11-07-2005 02:29 PM

Re: Ghostbusters III
 
[ QUOTE ]
so. BEN STILLER will star and this story now sucks!



still interested?


this was posted sunday...not sure i like the idea but a NY city in hell could be a good play. As a NY'er i always loved the franchise and thought it worked well, there is no need for them to go to a "5th dimension" and battle State Puff type monsters. Keep it all present day and it works so much better. IMO


I AIN'T 'FRAID OF NO GHOST

[/ QUOTE ]

Ugh, any Ghostbusters without Murray, Akroyd and Ramis (and Ernie Hudson) couldnt be the same. Ramis usually does good work though, so it might be decent, but I'm skeptical.

Aces McGee 11-07-2005 02:30 PM

Re: Ghostbusters III
 
[ QUOTE ]
Ghostbusters 2 was bad enough.


[/ QUOTE ]

I liked this more than most (the original is my favorite movie of all time), but what saved it was Bill Murray. The franchise without Murray figures to be really, really bad.

-McGee

slickpoppa 11-07-2005 02:30 PM

Re: Ghostbusters III
 
[ QUOTE ]
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Ghostbusters 2 was bad enough.

God damnit.

[/ QUOTE ]

It had some good moments. The courtroom scene was pretty funny.

Soul Daddy 11-07-2005 02:37 PM

Re: Ghostbusters III
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! Ghostbusters 2 was bad enough.

God damnit.

[/ QUOTE ]

It had some good moments. The courtroom scene was pretty funny.

[/ QUOTE ]
The Bobby Brown song was a highlight.

Alobar 11-07-2005 02:38 PM

Re: Ghostbusters III
 
how does ben stiller keep getting work? ugh

samjjones 11-07-2005 02:44 PM

Re: Ghostbusters III
 
This report is not true. Aykroyd wrote a script for Ghostbusters III years ago, and it was going to star Murray, Aykroyd, Ramis, Ben Stiller, and Chris Farley. Unfortunately, Murray wanted nothing to do with it (and he partially owns the rights, so everything has to be approved by him) and Farley died. This is not happening (thankfully).


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.