Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Politics (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   Kennedy Assasination - Conspiricy or No (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=385932)

jokerthief 11-27-2005 01:06 AM

Kennedy Assasination - Conspiricy or No
 
There is a program on the Kennedy assasination on the history channel right now. I've seen it before and it's a very good watch. I was shocked that 2/3 of the American public beleive there to be a conspiricy behind the assasination. So I now ask you all.

fluxrad 11-27-2005 01:44 AM

Re: Kennedy Assasination - Conspiricy or No
 
I voted "yes" in that I do not believe that Oswald acted alone or was necessarily the man that killed Kennedy.

11-27-2005 03:00 AM

Re: Kennedy Assasination - Conspiricy or No
 
I saw this earlier too. I can now actually buy in to the conclusion Oswald was the only 'shooter'. Still don't buy that he did it without help of any kind, though. Ditto Sirhan Sirhan and James Earl Ray.

Edit: Hadn't researched the MLK assassination for a number of years. Apparently, the King family has said they don't think Ray murdered him. Also, Ray escaped for a couple of days in 1977, along with Ted Bundy. Random.

Peter666 11-27-2005 04:51 AM

Re: Kennedy Assasination - Conspiricy or No
 
Undoubtebly some sort of conspiracy is involved. The major piece of circumstantial evidence was the assassination of Oswald by Jack Ruby (obviously a hitman in someone's hire).

The second piece of evidence is scientific. And that is the "magic bullet" found on Kennedy's stretcher. It is impossible that that bullet hit anything do to the lack of deformation. It was obviously fired under water and retrieved. Somebody planted that for sure.

jokerthief 11-27-2005 04:59 AM

Re: Kennedy Assasination - Conspiricy or No
 
[ QUOTE ]

The second piece of evidence is scientific. And that is the "magic bullet" found on Kennedy's stretcher. It is impossible that that bullet hit anything do to the lack of deformation. It was obviously fired under water and retrieved. Somebody planted that for sure.

[/ QUOTE ]

The history channel piece said that fragments of the magic bullet were found in the Governor's elbow. That fact would disprove your theory.

Peter666 11-27-2005 05:27 AM

Re: Kennedy Assasination - Conspiricy or No
 
Here is a picture of the "magic bullet"

http://www.picturehosting.org/images...orse/ce399.jpg

There is no fragmentation at all. It has retained 100% of its weight, and only the nose is very slightly deformed. It is impossible for this bullet to have hit anything if being shot out of a rifle in open air. It had to be fired underwater and retrieved.

You see, even the History Channel is in on the conspiracy! It's all a web of lies man, a web of lies! [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

jokerthief 11-27-2005 05:40 AM

Re: Kennedy Assasination - Conspiricy or No
 
That picture proves nothing. Fragments of the bullet in that picture could easily be missing, not to mention that that very well might not be the magic bullet. I saw a picture of the bullet fragments, where did they come from?

11-27-2005 05:44 AM

Re: Kennedy Assasination - Conspiricy or No
 
You say that picture proves nothing yet you're willing to take the History Channels' theory at face value?

Cyrus 11-27-2005 08:25 AM

Man
 
datory reading : "Case Closed"

Kurn, son of Mogh 11-27-2005 01:05 PM

Re: Kennedy Assasination - Conspiricy or No
 
Let's see. JFK was allegedly shot by a man with a checkered past who himself was shot before he could stand trial by a man with organized crime ties who had a terminal disease and died in prison before he could stand trial.

Even those disinclined to believe conspiracy theories have to say "hmmmm...."


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.