New future of hand histories?
 

Testing.

EDIT: one sec.

Not working imbedding in the forum, but check out this new form of hand history video:

http://www.pokerxfactor.com/servlet/...amp;handid=442

Re: New future of hand histories?
 

Looks really good.

Re: New future of hand histories?
 

Slick!

Re: New future of hand histories?
 

That would be so much better than these blah blah boring crap. Good stuff.

Re: New future of hand histories?
 

Too cool.

My bustout hand

Re: New future of hand histories?
 

Nice site, though the TT hand isn't as much fun to watch without half the forum yelling HOLD! in the chatbox.

It would be a cool site to go through just pressing next hand and browsing around if 99% of the posts weren't bad beats.

Re: New future of hand histories?
 

Lead the flop.

Re: New future of hand histories?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Lead the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hell no.

Re: New future of hand histories?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Lead the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wrong!

Re: New future of hand histories?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Lead the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wrong!

[/ QUOTE ]

With these stack sizes relative to the pot, I'd say leading is wrong... by a lot.

I may have pushed preflop however.

Re: New future of hand histories?
 

[ QUOTE ]

I may have pushed preflop however.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is why I believe leading is right. If I didn't push PF its because I put him on something like 99+, AJ+. I figure AJ and AQ non club are pretty likely to check behind on this flop. Leading often frustrates these hands and they may push over the top. If they were to cont. bet, its almost certain they'd fold to a reraise. Furthermore, a c/r is going to lose money, relative to leading against JJ and QQ.

Leading wins the same amount vs AA, AK and any hand with a club in it. Loses some if he has 99, and maybe AJ and AQ (though maybe not). Wins more vs QQ, JJ. Loses the same amount vs KK. I guess if so many people are disgusted by leading my thinking somewhere here is probably wrong.

Re: New future of hand histories?
 

I think your thinking is flawed if you think villain checks behind here with anything.

Re: New future of hand histories?
 

yep. villain isn't checking behind here. atleast, not often, and if he does, it's not the end of the world.

Re: New future of hand histories?
 

haha i remember that hand

he called with just the Ac....baahaha

Re: New future of hand histories?
 

[ QUOTE ]
haha i remember that hand

he called with just the Ac....baahaha

[/ QUOTE ]

Fairly standard call. Better than 2-1 if I remember the hand correctly...