Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=17)
-   -   time-pot hand (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=393789)

Tommy Angelo 12-08-2005 01:08 PM

Re: time-pot hand
 
"What kind of an extreme do you take this to?

If you get AA in the BB in your example and the SB folds (180 in the pot) would you just move in?"

Yes.

Tommy Angelo 12-08-2005 01:57 PM

Re: time-pot hand / repost
 
This is a reposting of a post that came out ugly due to errant quote commands.

[ QUOTE ]
If you raise, and steal all the blinds, you don't have to pay time, how come that wasn't an option? Time pots are the nuts when you are running cold.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because if I raise, the first $20 of the money I put in the pot completes the small blind, which makes $200 in called money in the pot, so no matter what happens after that, someone will pay $63.

durrrr 12-08-2005 06:10 PM

Re: time-pot hand
 
what about KK/QQ? Your line is wrong here i believe... i'm open to discussion as to why it is correct... however i think it is a very +EV call/raise preflop w/ AK there. Since it was a timepot i would probably just call. I think there would need to be some severe circumstances for me to muck this in the SB (such as knowing that the BB raises very frequently OOP, and people will limp/raise him).

durrrr 12-08-2005 06:11 PM

Re: time-pot hand
 
[ QUOTE ]
"What kind of an extreme do you take this to?

If you get AA in the BB in your example and the SB folds (180 in the pot) would you just move in?"

Yes.

[/ QUOTE ]

this is bad.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.