Follow up to Doyles bid for the wpt
msnbc
Not exactly unexpected |
Re: Follow up to Doyles bid for the wpt
Doyle has 700 million dollars?
I wonder if he's good at poker or if he's just running good.... |
Re: Follow up to Doyles bid for the wpt
He doesn't, it was a pump and dump. The SEC is just trying to find out which of Doyle's friends acquired a few million shares of WPT stock right before the news came out.
|
Re: Follow up to Doyles bid for the wpt
[ QUOTE ]
Doyle has 700 million dollars? I wonder if he's good at poker or if he's just running good.... [/ QUOTE ] Doyle's sample size is too small. He has only been playing for like 50+ years. In order to be statistically correct he would have to play for 178 years, 7 months, 13 days, 4 hours, and seven minutes. It's too early to tell if Doyle is truely a winning player in the long run. He truely might just be a bad player on a winning streak. |
Re: Follow up to Doyles bid for the wpt
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Doyle has 700 million dollars? I wonder if he's good at poker or if he's just running good.... [/ QUOTE ] Doyle's sample size is too small. He has only been playing for like 50+ years. In order to be statistically correct he would have to play for 178 years, 7 months, 13 days, 4 hours, and seven minutes. It's too early to tell if Doyle is truely a winning player in the long run. He truely might just be a bad player on a winning streak. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, especially since he primarily plays B&M and we all know that you only get about 35 hands an hour there. I think Gigabet may be the world's only proven winner since he's been 8 tabling for years. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] |
Re: Follow up to Doyles bid for the wpt
Is it illegal to do such a thing ? I mean how would they prove this ... Seems like it would be just 100% circumstancial evidence without any witnesses.
|
Re: Follow up to Doyles bid for the wpt
[ QUOTE ]
Is it illegal to do such a thing ? [/ QUOTE ] You can't be serious! |
Re: Follow up to Doyles bid for the wpt
[ QUOTE ]
Is it illegal to do such a thing ? I mean how would they prove this ... Seems like it would be just 100% circumstancial evidence without any witnesses. [/ QUOTE ] ...just ask Martha Stewart. |
Re: Follow up to Doyles bid for the wpt
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Is it illegal to do such a thing ? I mean how would they prove this ... Seems like it would be just 100% circumstancial evidence without any witnesses. [/ QUOTE ] ...just ask Martha Stewart. [/ QUOTE ] They never proved Martha did anything like this. They nailed her on a bogus "lying to a federal investigator" charge because they couldn't make the insder trading charges stick. |
Re: Follow up to Doyles bid for the wpt
[ QUOTE ]
They never proved Martha did anything like this. They nailed her on a bogus "lying to a federal investigator" charge because they couldn't make the insder trading charges stick. [/ QUOTE ] I know, just responding to the poster who asked if insider trading was illegal. okay, I change my comment to "just ask Samuel Waksal" (the guy who pled guilty to insider trading charges in the Stewart case). |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.