Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Medium-Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=54)
-   -   97s. (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=398223)

-Skeme- 12-14-2005 10:03 AM

97s.
 
Usually give up by turn, but not on this flop. No read on opponent.. only current read on hand.

-----
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $2 BB (9 handed)

Hero ($201.75)
SB ($258.10)
BB ($175.85)
UTG ($247.40)
UTG+1 ($232.60)
MP1 ($298.15)
MP2 ($107.15)
MP3 ($97.45)
CO ($174)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">4 folds</font>, MP3 calls $2, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $10</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, BB calls $8, MP3 calls $8.

Flop: ($31) T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
BB checks, MP3 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $16</font>, BB folds, MP3 calls $16.

Turn: ($63) Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
MP3 checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $72</font>
-----

Vhat do we think?

Gustavo 12-14-2005 10:05 AM

Re: 97s.
 
chip donation

-Skeme- 12-14-2005 10:06 AM

Re: 97s.
 
Donate some logic please.

Lady Dont Tekno 12-14-2005 10:08 AM

Re: 97s.
 
Plan for him calling the turn and checking the river (assume he still checks if a heart or diamond falls)?

Also I've never totally understood overbets, is this a good place to overbet and why?

-Skeme- 12-14-2005 10:10 AM

Re: 97s.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Plan for him calling the turn and checking the river (assume he still checks if a heart or diamond falls)?

[/ QUOTE ]

I am putting him all in. Please read stack sizes.


[ QUOTE ]
Also I've never totally understood overbets, is this a good place to overbet and why?

[/ QUOTE ]

That's what we're trying to figure out.

JFB37 12-14-2005 10:10 AM

Re: 97s.
 
I'm not a fan of naked bluffs when you have "no read on opponent."

AcesUp2121 12-14-2005 10:10 AM

Re: 97s.
 
Uhh, he folds a flush draw...

Your turn bet makes zero sense at all to me. Usually when someone does this to me I'm just like WTF and say whatever and fold. I guess that's what you were hoping for but I'm not most people.

-Skeme- 12-14-2005 10:12 AM

Re: 97s.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Your turn bet makes zero sense at all to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think my opponent might fold a draw or a better hand than I. What if I really had Aces here?

AcesUp2121 12-14-2005 10:19 AM

Re: 97s.
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Your turn bet makes zero sense at all to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think my opponent might fold a draw or a better hand than I. What if I really had Aces here?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think you play aces that way.

Riverman 12-14-2005 10:19 AM

Re: 97s.
 
These games are so easy to beat without this kind of thing that its uncalled for IMO. They will often put all their money in here with A 10 or something similar, so just wait for the goods and save yourself the trouble.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.