Party blackjack
 

I don't think there is a poster on this forum that has lost more than me at Party Blackjack, that includes El Diablo.

Re: Party blackjack
 

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think there is a poster on this forum that has lost more than me at Party Blackjack, that includes El Diablo.

[/ QUOTE ]

#s please.

Barron

Re: Party blackjack
 

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think there is a poster on this forum that has lost more than me at Party Blackjack, that includes El Diablo.

[/ QUOTE ]

i dont mean to be a jerk but thats just pathetic. ITS BLACKJACK. YOURE GOING TO LOSE.

Re: Party blackjack
 

I'm fairly sure you are over-estimating the amount he's lost, but with that said, let's hear some numbers. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

-Diplomat

Re: Party blackjack
 

Re: Party blackjack
 

Hi Mark,

Die.

Chris

Re: Party blackjack
 

wow. okay nevermind.

but if you include party blackjack with other blackjack, then i still claim this title.

Re: Party blackjack
 

the reason you are losing is because you do not understand the mathematics of blackjack, which is actually a profitable game if approached appropriately:

ON BLACKJACK (excerpt from How to Theoretically Beat Blackjack Using Logical Fallacies by Aaron Been and Jeffrey R. Garza)

The most important factor at work here is Reverse Gambler's Ruin which allows us to construct an infinite sequence of winning sessions. The construction works as follows: Take the outcome space for a session of gambling. The dimensions of this space are going to be isomorphic to a space constrained by the length of session, the amount wagered, and the standard deviation. If you assume a normal distribution you can map the outcome space onto a set of wager possibilities and find a optimal betting strategy. The key is that this mapping preserves order so we can scale our betting increments. If we define a new ordering by the inverse of profitability then we have our infinite sequence. The only problem? It violates well ordering.

However, the well ordering principle is axiom independent if we are operating in ZF set theory. Thus Godel's incompleteness implies our sequence is valid, and the triumph of man over reason is inevitable.

Re: Party blackjack
 

Any admitted excessive -EV-game-plyers should be automatically downgraded to newbie.

Re: Party blackjack
 

You obviously should be staking me at Party blackjack instead.