All this time people were telling me Party was the fishiest site...
But after playing on Paradise and Pacific this week, I think I can safely say that the players on both are far worse. $1/$2 on Paradise feels like $0.02/$0.04 on Stars.
Is this already well documented? |
Re: All this time people were telling me Party was the fishiest site...
[ QUOTE ]
But after playing on Paradise and Pacific this week, I think I can safely say that the players on both are far worse. $1/$2 on Paradise feels like $0.02/$0.04 on Stars. Is this already well documented? [/ QUOTE ] It is well documented that Pacific is fishier. However, you can only play 1 table, and it is buggy as hell. I'll oftentimes run 1 table of pacific while multitabling another site however. |
Re: All this time people were telling me Party was the fishiest site..
Meh. Party and Pacific are pretty fishy, but definetely not the fishiest site on the net.
|
Re: All this time people were telling me Party was the fishiest site..
Well, with what little experience I have, I thought Paradise was even worse than both. But please do enlighten me, which sites are worse (better)?
|
Re: All this time people were telling me Party was the fishiest site..
[ QUOTE ]
Meh. Party and Pacific are pretty fishy, but definetely not the fishiest site on the net. [/ QUOTE ] Of course, it depends on what stakes you're talking about. There are some small poker rooms tied to casinos that at times have very fish low limit games. but for mid-high sh? |
Re: All this time people were telling me Party was the fishiest site..
I think for mid poker, pacific is probably the best site. However everything else about them sucks. Including keeping the games secure and honest. which is why I don't play there.
|
Re: All this time people were telling me Party was the fishiest site..
pacific software is HORRIBLE. Paradise is meh
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.