Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
 

[ QUOTE ]
You made sure to tell that moron that he sucks at poker, and life in general, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

Duh.

Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
 

[ QUOTE ]
His play was hardly a bluff....

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, I don't know how to tell you idiots this any more.

If you look at the hand, I had a pair, he had Jack high. It is pretty simple. If you don't see this and agree with me that this was [censored], you're going on ignore as well.

Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
 

Sponger,

Relax, man. These morons have probably never done a cashout so they have not seen the rigged crap where they go all-in with a pair and some moron w/ Jack-high ends up winning. As you know, once they cashout, this rigged BS will start happening and then they will change their tune about these ridiculous beats.

Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
 

This forum doesn't need a sarcasm smiley. It needs a giant beeping strobe light screaming "SARCASM, SARCASM YOU MORON" at 120 decibels, preferably while also sending a power surge through the USB port to deliver an electric shock via the mouse to the reader which renders him incapable of movement until it sinks in.

Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
 

[ QUOTE ]
This forum doesn't need a sarcasm smiley. It needs a giant beeping strobe light screaming "SARCASM, SARCASM YOU MORON" at 120 decibels, preferably while also sending a power surge through the USB port to deliver an electric shock via the mouse to the reader which renders him incapable of movement until it sinks in.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have talked poker with Sponger before. I'm pretty sure he actually believes he got bad beated. Don't let your common sense get in the way!!

Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
 

[ QUOTE ]
9 diamonds, QJT7 for 12 more. yeah that's pretty decent.

[/ QUOTE ]

You forgot the factor in the board double pairing and the Jack playing kicker!!!

Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
His play was hardly a bluff....

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, I don't know how to tell you idiots this any more.

If you look at the hand, I had a pair, he had Jack high. It is pretty simple. If you don't see this and agree with me that this was [censored], you're going on ignore as well.

[/ QUOTE ]Yeah, it's pretty simple...

Let's look at what CardPlayer Odds calculator has to say.

-Chances of winning the hand after the flop-
Villain: 72.3%
Hero: 27.7%

[...] [img]/images/graemlins/ooo.gif[/img]

Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
 

[ QUOTE ]
This forum doesn't need a sarcasm smiley. It needs a giant beeping strobe light screaming "SARCASM, SARCASM YOU MORON" at 120 decibels, preferably while also sending a power surge through the USB port to deliver an electric shock via the mouse to the reader which renders him incapable of movement until it sinks in.

[/ QUOTE ]

Diablo's sarcasm is obvious, but I can't shake the feeling that sponger could be serious..

Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
 

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }

Re: Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
 

[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }

[/ QUOTE ]

What is this crap?

Let me explain this simply for you retards.

SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!

HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!