Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
 

what made hand checks that scary a board on the river?

Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
 

[ QUOTE ]
what made hand checks that scary a board on the river?

[/ QUOTE ]

OP got the board wrong, it wasn't as scary as that. See El D's post.

Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
 

i dont know the previous action, but this isnt incredibly out of line.

rj

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

no, he's saying that he did this time.

perhaps he had a reason to????

[/ QUOTE ]

That top quote does not = he did this time. He's saying its not an incredible call given the action, which it is.

Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
 

is EL Diablo's post correct? he very well could be, but i got my post from cardplayer. Or is worstplayer just following El diablo's post again?

Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
 

I think a lot of people on this board are very mechanical. In live games reads are everything and each situation is unique. Joe Cassidy made a very good read and made the call based on his read. I doubt he would normally call a CR with A high but he thoguht it was the right move this time.

Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
 

JW,

I just checked pokerwire and their description looks similar to Cardplayer's, not Gutshot's.

Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what made hand checks that scary a board on the river?

[/ QUOTE ]

OP got the board wrong, it wasn't as scary as that. See El D's post.

[/ QUOTE ]

THen what the hell was this based on?? I'm sorry for getting aggravated by my own posting, but was that quote just an example of just following highly credited posters and discarding others? I have a major problem with this forum just being a group of yes men and not having any opinions of their own. I mean, look at the quote. He immediately discounts my statement and then follows El Diablos.

Mainevent, If you were there, or have a better source, please discount my attack and i apoligize in advance. if you have a defense, please state it or I will have to look at your future posts in a different light.

Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
 

[ QUOTE ]
I think a lot of people on this board are very mechanical. In live games reads are everything and each situation is unique. Joe Cassidy made a very good read and made the call based on his read. I doubt he would normally call a CR with A high but he thoguht it was the right move this time.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would love to hear the thought process and logic behind this call. I'm not attacking him, i would merely like to know the assumptions and criteria of the player, board, before making this call since its clearly complicated. Peace

Most players on this site are also uncreative and unreceptive to other peoples points. Mechanical isnt the beggining of our problems.

Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
 

[ QUOTE ]
I would love to hear the thought process and logic behind this call.

[/ QUOTE ]

he probably thought his hand had a reasonable shot at being best

also, if you really want to learn something, leave the WPT forum asap. head over to the BBV forum instead [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Re: Joe cassidy\'s A high call on the river
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what made hand checks that scary a board on the river?

[/ QUOTE ]

OP got the board wrong, it wasn't as scary as that. See El D's post.

[/ QUOTE ]

THen what the hell was this based on?? I'm sorry for getting aggravated by my own posting, but was that quote just an example of just following highly credited posters and discarding others? I have a major problem with this forum just being a group of yes men and not having any opinions of their own. I mean, look at the quote. He immediately discounts my statement and then follows El Diablos.

Mainevent, If you were there, or have a better source, please discount my attack and i apoligize in advance. if you have a defense, please state it or I will have to look at your future posts in a different light.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not so much agreeing with Diablo as I am disagreeing with you. You had an 8 on the board, which no update site had and no one else who posted the hand on 2+2 had. I assumed it was a typo on your part, since I can't think of any source you could have gotten it from.

BTW, I posted the hand with the same description in the GIGABET thread before Diablo or anyone else on 2+2 posted the hand at all, so I don't know how I'm "following" anyone.