Re: omfg not another pf Q!!
 

I limp all of them.

Re: omfg not another pf Q!!
 

I don't fold any A in the SB if I can just complete.

Re: omfg not another pf Q!!
 

[ QUOTE ]
I don't fold any A in the SB if I can just complete.

[/ QUOTE ]

You know, I answered this question one way, then watched my own play today.

I played exactly as you said... I never folded an Ace in the SB for 1/4 of a BB. So please change my answer; I apparently don't know my own play.

Re: omfg not another pf Q!!
 

call or raise depending on how button sb... if they will never fold for one bet, call.. sometimes raise.

if this is realy giving you problems (yikes?), you could just move up in stakes and mostly eliminate this problem.

Re: omfg not another pf Q!!
 

well i limp with all, and realize somehow that I am like (.99) with these hands. (ok exaggeration) but i think it would be much better off if i just folded them. i suck with these. really badly.

Re: omfg not another pf Q!!
 

[ QUOTE ]
Muck most of those... limp the middle ones, raise the bigger ones. Tough to understand, I know [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Edit: I'm assuming a 1/2 blind structure, not a 2/3.

[/ QUOTE ]

How often do you think A2 is the currently best hand in this situation?

If we assume that it always beats the button, which is probably pretty close then that just leaves the one random hand in the BB. 12/13 * 11/13 are his odds of no ace / no pair, which means you have the best hand 78% of the time.

Even if you give the button some chance of limping a better ace, you still have the best hand the overwhelming majority of the time. To do anything but raise as a default play seems difficult to defend.

Put it another way... if you were the button, or the big blind, what do you want the SB to do with this hand? I want him to fold, and if not then call, and I'd least like him to raise. So there you go.

-Eric

Re: omfg not another pf Q!!
 

If the button is limping and the BB has a random hand, shouldn't you presume you have the best hand pf and raise? I realize you are oop, but you get the intiative here and have a pretty decent chance of getting hu.

Or are you just giving BB odds to call with most of his holdings?

Re: omfg not another pf Q!!
 

[ QUOTE ]
If the button is limping and the BB has a random hand, shouldn't you presume you have the best hand pf and raise?

[/ QUOTE ]
The implied odds on this undertaking are horrible. If you raise A4 and get heads up with button there are only two possible outcomes to the hand:

1. You take it down on the flop or turn.

2. You go to showdown and lose.

I'm exaggerating, but the fact remains that you are OOP versus a Villain who has something like T9 and almost always knows who has the best hand. Meanwhile you have no idea if your ace is good or not.

Of course if BB does play and he probably will that's just terrible.

Re: omfg not another pf Q!!
 

Cool - thanks for taking the time to explain that. I am often guilty of raising and not really understanding why I am doing it...

Re: omfg not another pf Q!!
 

[ QUOTE ]
If you raise A4 and get heads up with button there are only two possible outcomes to the hand:

1. You take it down on the flop or turn.

2. You go to showdown and lose.

[/ QUOTE ]
I frequently win showdowns unimproved in this situation against loose/passive players (and it's mostly loose/passive players who are limping first in on the button). Also what's so bad about (1)?

I don't understand why this is so hard to play. You're out of position, yeah, but people who limp their button first in aren't exactly going to put you to the test postflop.