please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
 

why does WinstonSomme get to raise again after DEETEE goes all in for .73 more than a $2 bet?

***** Hand History for Game 3003659181 *****
$25 PL Omaha - Tuesday, November 08, 17:08:19 EDT 2005
Table Table 65457 (Real Money)
Seat 1 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: WinstonSomme ( $22.50 )
Seat 2: poppos ( $8.95 )
Seat 4: boss46 ( $30.42 )
Seat 5: MoxNix ( $14 )
Seat 7: cart5r ( $10.46 )
Seat 9: DEETEE ( $5.48 )
Seat 10: ME ( $47.60 )
Seat 8: Bills_420 ( $14.25 )
Seat 3: MNparks ( $4.75 )
Seat 6: vssd210 ( $24.75 )
poppos posts small blind [$0.10].
MNparks posts big blind [$0.25].
** Dealing down cards **
MoxNix calls [$0.25].
vssd210 folds.
cart5r calls [$0.25].
Bills_420 calls [$0.25].
DEETEE calls [$0.25].
ME calls [$0.25].
WinstonSomme calls [$0.25].
poppos calls [$0.15].
MNparks raises [$0.50].
MoxNix calls [$0.50].
cart5r calls [$0.50].
Bills_420 calls [$0.50].
DEETEE calls [$0.50].
ME calls [$0.50].
WinstonSomme calls [$0.50].
poppos calls [$0.50].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 7h, 9c, 8h ]
poppos checks.
MNparks bets [$2].
MoxNix folds.
cart5r folds.
Bills_420 calls [$2].
DEETEE calls [$2].
ME raises [$4].
WinstonSomme calls [$4].
poppos folds.
MNparks is all-In [$2]
Bills_420 folds.
DEETEE is all-In [$2.73]
ME calls [$0.73].
WinstonSomme is all-In [$17.75]
ME folds.
** Dealing Turn ** [ Th ]
** Dealing River ** [ As ]
MNparks shows [ Qs, Ah, Qh, 4s ] a flush, ace high.
DEETEE shows [ 7s, 2c, 7d, Ts ] three of a kind, sevens.
WinstonSomme shows [ Jd, Tc, 2s, Kc ] a straight, seven to jack.
WinstonSomme wins $17.02 from side pot #2 with a straight, seven to jack.
WinstonSomme wins $2.09 from side pot #1 with a straight, seven to jack.
MNparks wins $22.80 from the main pot with a flush, ace high.

Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
 

Umm....Isn't it POT Limit? Can't you bet the size of the pot at any time?

Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
 

[ QUOTE ]
Umm....Isn't it POT Limit? Can't you bet the size of the pot at any time?

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, but why is betting reopened to WinstonSomme?

Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
 

known glitch.

Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
 

[ QUOTE ]
known glitch.

[/ QUOTE ]

do you know what makes it happen? why haven't they fixed it?

Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
 

Interesting. I have played much Pot and NL ring games on party and never encountered that. I'd email their support about it and see what their response is.

PG

Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
 

why wouldn't it be? isn't the .73 cents a raise?

Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
 

Why is this a bug? Winston doesn't raise himself, he just calls. If he had raised, he should naturally not be able to reraise, but since he just called, action is opened to him again.

Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
 

It's a bug because the action should not be re-opened on a "raise" that is less than the amount of the original raise.

The all in player is effectively calling, not raising, and therefor Winston shouldn't have the option or re-raising.

This is definately a glitch in the software.

Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
 

so WinstonSomme should only be able to call .73 cents? i see what you're saying, but it doesn't make sense to me. what if the guy had been all-in for one cent less than the previous bet. that would essentially have been a full raise, but, by what you're saying, later players, like WinstonSomme, would only be able to call... how is that fair?