Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   $100 NL - AQ versus tough player (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=390364)

Malachii 12-03-2005 02:17 AM

$100 NL - AQ versus tough player
 
$100 NL 6max

Tough player minraises UTG. I'm not sure what this is, but my notes on him are that he's "Very aggressive postflop, capable of raising weak beats w/ out a hand."

We're playing 5 handed. I consider reraising with AQ on the button, but elect to just call and take a flop. The blinds come along.

Flop is A-T-7 rainbow $8 in pot

Check, check, tough player bets $8. I call. Blinds fold.

$24 in pot

Turn is another A, putting two hearts up there. He deliberates and bets $20. I'm really not sure if I push or just call here. He's probably capable of firing again on a draw here, but I have no evidence to support this. I elect to call.

River is an offsuit J, $62 in pot. He best $50. I think and fold.

Comments?

wdeadwyler 12-03-2005 02:26 AM

Re: $100 NL - AQ versus tough player
 
if he is minraising he is not a tough player. Raise the turn, call the river, esp with your read.

PeteGI 12-03-2005 02:58 AM

Re: $100 NL - AQ versus tough player
 
Your cold calls look like a weak ace. In most instances I would think AQ AK reraises a min bet with position in a 5 handed game. Since you did not, it would be tough to put you on that strong of a hand, and so I think you should call the river bet.

Malachii 12-03-2005 03:03 AM

Re: $100 NL - AQ versus tough player
 
[ QUOTE ]
if he is minraising he is not a tough player.

[/ QUOTE ] I disagree. Minraising UTG doesn't preclude him from being both a tight player preflop and a very aggressive player postflop, especially with position. These qualities make him somebody I would prefer to not have at my table, which qualifies him as a "tough player" in my book.


[ QUOTE ]
Raise the turn, call the river, esp with your read.

[/ QUOTE ] What are you putting him on that I'm beating by the river?

PeteGI 12-03-2005 03:11 AM

Re: $100 NL - AQ versus tough player
 
What hand are you putting him on that you fold? Why call two pot size bets and fold to a third? IF you think you are beat then just fold the turn.
You should be raising that turn, but if you decide to call the turn you need to call a reasonable river bet, which his was.

Malachii 12-03-2005 03:15 AM

Re: $100 NL - AQ versus tough player
 
Well, the straight draw got there + I'm no longer beating AJ. It's a bad river card.

[ QUOTE ]
You should be raising that turn

[/ QUOTE ]
Perhaps you're right.

Lucky 12-03-2005 04:26 AM

Re: $100 NL - AQ versus tough player
 
[ QUOTE ]
Well, the straight draw got there + I'm no longer beating AJ. It's a bad river card.

[ QUOTE ]
You should be raising that turn

[/ QUOTE ]
Perhaps you're right.

[/ QUOTE ]

I actually like the turn call. Obviously, also call the river. If he gay raised a weaker A PF, he wont have you on AQ, as he would have expected you to do something at some point. I think this is a textbook hand of when you just call down when someones doing the betting for you.

Bukem_ 12-03-2005 04:41 AM

Re: $100 NL - AQ versus tough player
 
Its ok to make a "bad call" on the river.

6 max is aggressive enough, and you really don't have enough info to make this laydown.

You can actually minraise the turn also to freeze him up, then evaluate if you want to value bet the river if he calls.

wdeadwyler 12-03-2005 05:40 AM

Re: $100 NL - AQ versus tough player
 
[ QUOTE ]
What hand are you putting him on that you fold? Why call two pot size bets and fold to a third? IF you think you are beat then just fold the turn.
You should be raising that turn, but if you decide to call the turn you need to call a reasonable river bet, which his was.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have trouble putting him on anything because you never once got aggro here. He could have a weaker ace, air, a better ace, but im not folding AQ with the line you took. Now if you raised the flop and he still pulled something like this, it becomes much more borderline.

Edit: River is closer than I thought, but the fact that he has NO clue you have trips makes me think call. I really think you need to get your money in on the turn here. And strongly consider reraising preflop.

12-03-2005 05:48 AM

Re: $100 NL - AQ versus tough player
 
The 3 hands I most likely put him on, given the min-raise, are 77, AT and 98. The first two are both very strong made hands and that board only has one real draw, so the betting pattern seems to be he has a made hand and figures you for a made hand.

The other, much more unlikely alternative in my opinion, is 9 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 8 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. That's a hand that wants a multi-way juiced pot, which the min-raise seems to have accomplished, and then he plays it very hard and fast. The two hearts on the turn give him enough outs to continue representing at least TP, but the paired board would give him pause.

In any of these, you are beat by the river. The only hands you beat at the moment are the case-ace, non-king-kicker and some horrifically overplayed high PP. Because you were calling all along, the most obvious draw hit, and he fired out anyway... he probably has even that beat.

Also, I would strongly considering reraising pre-flop. You made no attempt to define his hand and AQ is a dangerous hand to play without some idea of what he has. Calling seems the best way to get hit w/AK.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.