Re: Repeat after me, and don\'t forget it....
 

[ QUOTE ]
If you actually watched that game then you know the Raiders should have won.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, and if you watched that game, you would have seen it was the Raiders playing, and would have factored in that they've been the best team in the NFL over the last dozen years of finding a way to lose games that they have a chance to win. That game vs. the Chiefs was no exception and no surprise.

Re: Repeat after me, and don\'t forget it....
 

[ QUOTE ]
Chiefs, Road, Suck.

Chiefs, Road, Suck.

Chiefs, Road, Suck.

Lori

[/ QUOTE ]

Too early to tell if it's really "Chiefs still suck in Denver"

Re: Repeat after me, and don\'t forget it....
 

t they've been the best team in the NFL over the last dozen years of finding a way to lose games that they have a chance to win.

what does 12 (or even 3) years ago have to do with last night?

Re: Repeat after me, and don\'t forget it....
 

He's assuming an institutional affliction. Whether that's true or not is a moot point.

Re: Repeat after me, and don\'t forget it....
 

[ QUOTE ]
He's assuming an institutional affliction. Whether that's true or not is a moot point.

[/ QUOTE ]

oh, i know what he was assuming. i was just surprised that anyone would consider it a plausible factor.

Re: Repeat after me, and don\'t forget it....
 

[ QUOTE ]
oh, i know what he was assuming. i was just surprised that anyone would consider it a plausible factor.

[/ QUOTE ]

Mostly just a retort to that, "If the Raiders had just done __ and ___" and KC hadn't elimnated any of their mistakes, then.... bemoaning (which is valid to some extent, but not at all jiving with the facetious tone of my first post).

Though if the Raiders have made some solid offseason acquisitions (i.e., a certain WR and RB) that has the O/U on their season win total inflated a bit (given their continuing weaknesses in certain areas and tough schedule), then maybe it is something to factor in...