No no-limit shorthanded forum, why ?
 

Howcome there isn't a shorthanded section in the no (pot) limit section.

Seems like full and 6 max. no-limit are two very differnt games, and i think a lot play nl shorthanded.

Re: No-limit shorthanded forum
 

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/po...amp;PHPSESSID=

??

Re: No-limit shorthanded forum
 

[ QUOTE ]
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/po...amp;PHPSESSID=

??

[/ QUOTE ]

But thats in the Limit section, isn't it ?

Re: No-limit shorthanded forum
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/po...amp;PHPSESSID=

??

[/ QUOTE ]

But thats in the Limit section, isn't it ?

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah i just realized that.

/me shuts up

Re: No no-limit shorthanded forum, why ?
 

Many players here play 6-max, so you will get accurate feedback in the SSNL forum.

Re: No no-limit shorthanded forum, why ?
 

I've wondered about this too, it seems that a big part of the education of a poker player is in learning to extract max value from low-equity situations. It seems that shorthanded poker offers many more oppurtunities for this because of how you must play looser.

Then again maybe we don't need another forum and we need to shut up and let the mods and other powers that be do as they please.

Cambraceres

Re: No no-limit shorthanded forum, why ?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Many players here play 6-max, so you will get accurate feedback in the SSNL forum.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree.

I just can't understand why there is a limit short-hand but not a no-limit shorthand forum.

When people talk generally it often not said whether they play full or short.

I just think a split-up would benefit both full and short players - i now i would like it, as i have just started playing shorthanded, and think it is totally different from full.

Re: No no-limit shorthanded forum, why ?
 

Limit is genarlly considered a harder game to beat, perhaps this is the reason? Maybe they think this would be overkill?

Cambraceres

Re: No no-limit shorthanded forum, why ?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Limit is genarlly considered a harder game to beat, perhaps this is the reason? Maybe they think this would be overkill?

Cambraceres

[/ QUOTE ]

Is it considered easier to beat no-limit that limit shorthanded ? - I don't understand that.

Re: No no-limit shorthanded forum, why ?
 

I don't know what is considered easier, maybe it's just preference. However, personally I would much rather be at a shorthanded NL table full of uber maniacs or donks than a Limit table with the same players.