Increase in Party/skins rake at 6-max
 

Looks like they're raking $3 when the pot is over $60 (according to http://www.partypoker.com/games/rake.html) now.

They've just done this unannounced it seems, is there anything we can do about it? I'm outraged.

Re: Increase in Party/skins rake at 6-max
 

What was it before?

Re: Increase in Party/skins rake at 6-max
 

Seems standard. Pokerstars has a max of $3/pot for 6-max

Re: Increase in Party/skins rake at 6-max
 

Previously it was max $2 at 6-max, as the rake was divided up against less people.

What with pokerroom first and now this, this is an extremely worrying trend.

Re: Increase in Party/skins rake at 6-max
 

[ QUOTE ]
All depends on whether there is a full table at 6-max.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah that's something, but it's still terrible compared to before.

Assuming the tables on Party's site are right anyway, they have been wrong before.

Re: Increase in Party/skins rake at 6-max
 

[ QUOTE ]
this is an extremely worrying trend.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am not too worried. Everyone has seen what a cash cow poker sites have become. If some sites get out of hand, others will benefit.

Remember Paradise used to be king. The power will change if this sh.. continues.

Re: Increase in Party/skins rake at 6-max
 

[ QUOTE ]
I am not too worried. Everyone has seen what a cash cow poker sites have become. If some sites get out of hand, others will benefit.

[/ QUOTE ]
not if no one notices. 95% of players won't.

Re: Increase in Party/skins rake at 6-max
 

FU Party. I pay enough rake already. Muthafuckas

Re: Increase in Party/skins rake at 6-max
 

it appears as though the non 6 max games rake has changed as well....
i've been noticing 5 cent rakes with pots under $2 at the NL 50 tables...

or have i just never noticed before?

Re: Increase in Party/skins rake at 6-max
 

[ QUOTE ]
it appears as though the non 6 max games rake has changed as well....
i've been noticing 5 cent rakes with pots under $2 at the NL 50 tables...

or have i just never noticed before?

[/ QUOTE ]

Did we not establish that this has always been the case?