Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   $22: Too weak with QQ in position? (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=315674)

spentrent 08-15-2005 02:29 PM

$22: Too weak with QQ in position?
 
10 players

Seat 8: VILLAIN ( $800 )
Seat 4: HERO ( $800 )

Blinds(10/15)

** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Hero [ Qs Qd ]
VILLAIN calls [15].
4 folds
some guy calls [15].
HERO raises [75].
3 folds
VILLAIN calls [60].
some guy folds.

** Dealing Flop ** [ Kh, Jd, 8c ]
VILLAIN bets [30].
HERO calls [30].

** Dealing Turn ** [ 4s ]
VILLAIN bets [30].
HERO calls [30].

** Dealing River ** [ 5c ]
VILLAIN bets [50].
HERO calls [50].

kyro 08-15-2005 02:31 PM

Re: $22: Too weak with QQ in position?
 
looks good. stacks too shallow to get cute after the PF raise. I just call down.

illegit 08-15-2005 02:41 PM

Re: $22: Too weak with QQ in position?
 
I probably raise the flop to 110 then check it down if met with resistance. He hit a 2 outer on ya?

spentrent 08-15-2005 03:06 PM

Re: $22: Too weak with QQ in position?
 
[ QUOTE ]
I probably raise the flop to 110 then check it down if met with resistance.

[/ QUOTE ]

On the flop, I figured there were no reasonable draws for either of us to worry about. Thus, his small bet could have been an attempt to induce me to bet into his TPTK.

Likewise, I had no reasonable draws to protect my hand from; I felt I could call for "value" here and see how he plays the turn.

[ QUOTE ]
He hit a 2 outer on ya?

[/ QUOTE ]

No, I won the hand but that wasn't the point of the question. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Isura 08-15-2005 03:57 PM

Re: $22: Too weak with QQ in position?
 
Looks good. Classical WA/WB.

08-15-2005 04:01 PM

Re: $22: Too weak with QQ in position?
 
I would have raise more pre flop, to about 100. Obviously after that I would have played post flop differently, but given the way you played preflop I think you played the hand the way you should have.

spentrent 08-15-2005 05:14 PM

Re: $22: Too weak with QQ in position?
 
[ QUOTE ]
I would have raise more pre flop, to about 100. Obviously after that I would have played post flop differently, but given the way you played preflop I think you played the hand the way you should have.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't understand why it's obvious that you'd have played post-flop differently had you made it 100.

How would those extra 50 chips in the pot have affected your post-flop line?

spentrent 08-15-2005 05:14 PM

Re: $22: Too weak with QQ in position?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Looks good. Classical WA/WB.

[/ QUOTE ]

What does "WA/WB" mean? Thanks.

Ixnert 08-15-2005 05:25 PM

Re: $22: Too weak with QQ in position?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Looks good. Classical WA/WB.

[/ QUOTE ]

What does "WA/WB" mean? Thanks.

[/ QUOTE ]

Way ahead/way behind. As in, you are either/or, and have no good way of determining which.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.