Re: ($60) So you don\'t all thing I\'m a LAG moeran
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
so you think he has a set? KK and AA he reraises preflop.

[/ QUOTE ]
what else can SB have?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think his range is exactly AQ/77/33.

[/ QUOTE ]

is he more likely slow play a set on this drawless flop? check/miniraise is more like a set.

Re: ($60) So you don\'t all think I\'m a LAG moeran
 

on paper this looks like a crazy fold....but I think I might do the same. I have no idea, I think you gotta be there.

Re: ($60) So you don\'t all thing I\'m a LAG moeran
 

[ QUOTE ]
He didn't complete, he called a level 3 minraise. But he was folding to completes in level 1. To call the minraise preflop and have a hand I beat here means he has exactly KQ... but I would have been very surprised to see him flip over KQ at showdown after this flop action.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe, but he could also have noticed the other guy is a LAG donk and be making a play back at him. I think you make pretty good reads though so you're probably correct.

Re: ($60) So you don\'t all think I\'m a LAG moeran
 

This kind of post is meaningless without posting read information. It's not a good play at a low-limit table of unknowns, but it's an extremely easy play if you have PAHud up with several hundred hands of information displayed on SB.

Actually, now that I think about it I guess even with the read information that'd make OP meaningless. Unless of course the point of the original post is just to prove that you aren't some kind of LAG moeran.

Re: ($60) So you don\'t all think I\'m a LAG moeran
 

Such plays are within reason IMO. I dont have a big problem with it...some guys you just know that they arent likely to do this without better than AQ.

I may have played the hand exactly the same way. I almost always check this flop too.