Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   Action with Jacks an' I'm confused at the $109s (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=399847)

12-16-2005 08:27 PM

Re: Action with Jacks an\' I\'m confused at the $109s
 
This kind of insanity at the 109s!!!!????

Good god.

tipperdog 12-16-2005 08:28 PM

Re: Action with Jacks an\' I\'m confused at the $109s
 
I call. Never say never...but...

Never fold an overpair early in a SnG.

Edit: I mean PUSH! Must have been a misclick in my OP [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

adanthar 12-16-2005 08:32 PM

Re: Action with Jacks an\' I\'m confused at the $109s
 
I'd have pushed. The minraise means (meant) nothing and the bet is a classic probe. The call is a ten or some crap way more than a set.

I don't really *hate* your fold, but I hope you don't try it with queens.

tigerite 12-16-2005 08:56 PM

Re: Action with Jacks an\' I\'m confused at the $109s
 
Yes there's no way the first guy to bet on this flop has anything much. A ten, and that's it. The middle guy is perhaps a minor worry/irritant, but without any reads on him I'm certainly not putting him on QQ+ or a set. If he was a known decent player, that's when I would seriously consider folding.

kyro 12-16-2005 09:08 PM

Re: Action with Jacks an\' I\'m confused at the $109s
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'd have pushed. The minraise means (meant) nothing and the bet is a classic probe. The call is a ten or some crap way more than a set.

I don't really *hate* your fold, but I hope you don't try it with queens.

[/ QUOTE ]

Interestingly enough, I put one of them on QQ, so if I hold QQ, I probably don't fold.

Slim Pickens 12-16-2005 10:10 PM

Re: Action with Jacks an\' I\'m confused at the $109s
 
[ QUOTE ]
However, talk seems to be dying. I folded, hating it. SB had 99 and caller(MP1?) had KTo. They got it all-in on the turn. And I was afraid of the $109s!

[/ QUOTE ]

Sweet Jesus. That has got to be an anomaly. Part of the reason to fold that hand is saying "Well, they can't both be that stupid. Someone has to have something better than a weak overpair to pot committ themselves on the flop." In general, I think folding here is prudent.

12-16-2005 11:20 PM

Re: Action with Jacks an\' I\'m confused at the $109s
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
However, talk seems to be dying. I folded, hating it. SB had 99 and caller(MP1?) had KTo. They got it all-in on the turn. And I was afraid of the $109s!

[/ QUOTE ]

Sweet Jesus. That has got to be an anomaly. Part of the reason to fold that hand is saying "Well, they can't both be that stupid. Someone has to have something better than a weak overpair to pot committ themselves on the flop." In general, I think folding here is prudent.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, we're getting results oriented here. Just because these two happened to be donks, doesn't mean the "average" 109 players would be making these plays. I agree 100% with the assertion above. Many timse I think, BOTH of these two can't be complete idiots. Well, yes, apparently even at the 109s....


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.