Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   (OT) Party poker randomization (just observations, no whining) (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=393267)

12-07-2005 10:27 AM

Re: (OT) Party poker randomization (just observations, no whining)
 
You need to post this in the zoo where the flames are alot funnier.

tshort 12-07-2005 10:45 AM

Re: (OT) Party poker randomization (just observations, no whining)
 
[ QUOTE ]
You need to post this in the zoo where the flames are alot funnier.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. Please repost in the Zoo and update us on the thread.

Maulik 12-07-2005 10:53 AM

Re: (OT) Party poker randomization (just observations, no whining)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
we don't understand probability at all.

[/ QUOTE ]

Speak for yourself [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

and what I don't Toronto mosdef me. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

UMTerp 12-07-2005 01:03 PM

Re: (OT) Party poker randomization (just observations, no whining)
 
Originallyposted by EnderFFX:
[ QUOTE ]
Blah blah blah...

[/ QUOTE ]

Come on Scott, you're better than that.

Slim Pickens 12-07-2005 01:11 PM

Re: (OT) Party poker randomization (just observations, no whining)
 
1) One time I noticed something like that, but then realized one table was an Empire and the other a Party, post-split. Then I felt stupid for even noticing it.

2) My housemate who doesn't play poker pointed out that by switching hands between two of my tables, I wouls have flopped full houses on both. I was proud of myself for not noticing this until someone pointed it out.

12-08-2005 08:09 PM

Re: (OT) Party poker randomization (just observations, no whining)
 
I just came on to say the best cure for this is multitabling across sites (try 4) but Slim (implicitly) beat me to it.

Anyway it cured this resolute pattern finder...

12-08-2005 09:18 PM

Re: (OT) Party poker randomization (just observations, no whining)
 
[ QUOTE ]
...I thought I would post my thoughts.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well? We are still waiting for one. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

good2cu 12-08-2005 09:34 PM

Re: (OT) Party poker randomization (just observations, no whining)
 
[ QUOTE ]
The human mind is remarkable in it's ability to create patterns out of anything. If we didn't have this ability, we wouldn't really be able to accomplish much. Our brains would behave essentially like low-powered computers that had no creativity and couldn't do anything we weren't told to do.

On the other hand, it causes us to create patterns in things that really aren't there. Because seeing similarities is a pattern, they tend to stick out in your mind. If you're playing 8-10 tables, you will almost always find something. However, consider all the tables you're playing and how almost all of the other combinations that could have happened, didn't happen.

Suppose you're playing 8 tables and you notice that you have similar hole cards on two of the tables and similar hole cards. You've noticed two similarities. However, with 8-tables there are 28 different pairs of hole cards you could have compared. So you're shooting 2/28, which is hardly remarkable.

[/ QUOTE ]

Have you read "Fooled by Randomness"?

12-08-2005 09:36 PM

Re: (OT) Party poker randomization (just observations, no whining)
 
A couple nights ago I was delighted to see QQ for the second hand in a row. I happily called an all-in and then noticed that my QQ was actually a Q8. Now I wonder if I even had QQ once...

mlagoo 12-08-2005 09:37 PM

Re: (OT) Party poker randomization (just observations, no whining)
 
FAR OUT MAANNN


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.