Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Televised Poker (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=35)
-   -   Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker. (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=151615)

HighStakesPro 11-20-2004 10:55 PM

Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
That's right Phillips, you've met your match. Unlike you, I've actually won a large tournament, in fact over 1700 people with a dollar that said they thought they could defeat me in a no limit hold'em tournament, and I proved each and every one of those pretenders wrong. You think that was a fluke? Just a week before that I placed 5th out of over 2000 entrants in a $2 buyin tournament despite being shortstacked through the final two tables. I made in credible plays and my skills are clearly far superior to yours. I've been playing poker for much less time than you and I already have you beat. You've never won any tournament with even close to the number of players that were in mine. Plus, the people in the $1 tourneys are much, much more dangerous than the ones in those big buyin tournaments you hide behind. You can't push in a third of your stack with middle pair and expect to get away with it. You have to actually know how to play poker to win a tournament like that. Those 10K buyin events are easy because you can just push your stack in when you're in trouble and they give you the pot.

Plus, not only do I unequivocally outclass you in hold'em, but I also put you to shame in Omaha/8. I've won an Oomaha/8 event, 50+5 buyin, and I even outlasted Brett Jungblut, the supposed "world champion" of Omaha/8. I owned him. He didn't have a chance against me. And every one of the 90 people in that tournament could have destroyed that pretender Curtis Bibb that you couldn't even beat in the heads up at the WSOP. That's right, Phillips, you got SECOND PLACE while I got FIRST. You'll always be doomed to inferior to my unmatched poker skills. And as if that victory wasn't enough, I defied the odds and placed THIRD the VERY NEXT TIME I ENTERED THAT TOURNEY. You've never won anything except those lame 10K buyin NL hold'em events, while I've won everything from small buyins tournaments with huge fields to big buyin tourneys with skilled fields to intimidating sit and go tournaments to satelites for 350K guaranteed prizes event. Oh, you've made six final tables this year? Guess what? I've made SEVEN. So, to recap, I'm better at hold'em, better at Omaha/8, more consistent, more versatile, and better at pretty much anything related to poker. Basically, Paul Phillips, I rule, and you suck.

Edge34 11-20-2004 11:08 PM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
You forgot one important thing. Paul Phillips could buy and sell your ass 1000 times over and still have money left for a cup of coffee. At Starbucks.

What a freaking troll, you haven't been banned yet?

miajag81 11-20-2004 11:09 PM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
Post of the year.

Scooterdoo 11-20-2004 11:17 PM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
I know nothing about you or your poker skills. I only know what I read in your post, but I would suggest that you sleep on it and then urge/beg Matt to delete the post. Your logic is similar to 'I am better than Michael Jordan in basketball. He only won 6 NBA titles, I won the king of the hill title 15 times in my neighborhood game' or how about 'Jeff Gordon who? I'm the very best in my town at Pinewood Derby racing'.

Listen, I'm not criticizing your poker play and perhaps you are great. It's extremely difficult to win online tournaments. But to compare the skill level at $1 buy-in online tournaments to $10k pro events is a bit ridiculous. It must be a joke if you are really serious about the comparison. Again, your skill is most likely very high if you are placing consistently high in these events. I would urge you to get involved in bigger buy-in live events with top players if you are truly confident in your poker skills. If you do well at these events I'm sure you will have no need to trump your own horn.

slickpoppa 11-20-2004 11:22 PM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
You took this post way too seriously

Aceshigh7 11-20-2004 11:38 PM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
Great post. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Alot of these people have no sense of humor at all.

fnurt 11-21-2004 12:18 AM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
[ QUOTE ]
If you do well at these events I'm sure you will have no need to trump your own horn.

[/ QUOTE ]

"trump your own horn"? Is that what happens when you play bridge while fox hunting?

Sarcasm detector on, this was a cute post...

binions 11-21-2004 01:22 AM

But, how\'s your scrabble?
 
Let me guess - you're a writer with a huge vocabulary?

ggpwnd 11-21-2004 01:22 AM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
are the $1, $2, OR $50 tourney televised? lol...

Fitz 11-21-2004 01:40 AM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
I'm really hoping your post is tounge in cheek; if it is, it could be construed as somewhat humorous.

If it is serious, Paul should purchase your employer just to fire you....

Of course, even he might not have enough money to buy McDonalds, so you have escaped justice again.

Two more years, and you get a better paper hat...

Fitz

phixxx 11-21-2004 02:02 AM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
^^

How do you purchase an employer?

TStoneMBD 11-21-2004 02:09 AM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
Ive seen HighStakesPro finish multiple times on Pokerstars so his claims are in fact correct, he IS better than Paul Phillips.

Miamipuck 11-21-2004 02:46 AM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
My god how can some of you actually think this was a serious post. It is hilarious, very good entertainment.
If I was Paul I would be LMAO reading that. You should see High Stakes other post too. They are funny, unless of course you can not see the forest for the trees.

slickpoppa 11-21-2004 03:05 AM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
Yeah, his other post was funny too. But what was even funnier was that people took it seriously. You would think that in a poker forum people would be able to see others' intentions and not be so gullible.

knifeandfork 11-21-2004 04:52 AM

pauls response
 
"mr high stakes,
im going to buy pokerstars just so i can ban you, then im going to buy the next site you play at just so i can ban you again. then perhaps with no place to hone your skills i can feel safer at the top of the tournament food chain."

DCIAce 11-21-2004 05:21 AM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
sarcasm detector.

Seriously, the guy isn't even being subtle, and people still take him seriously.

Woody09 11-21-2004 01:17 PM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
That was deff one of the funnier posts i'ver read here. And what is truely funnier is that people on this site jump on a thread to admonish a poster without even thinking for a second that it could be a joke. The only people who should be banned after this post are those of you who can't see that this post was funny as hell.

pipes 11-21-2004 03:05 PM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
Yes, they did. It was meant to be a joke, it was great!

Slacker13 11-21-2004 06:54 PM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
[ QUOTE ]
You took this post way too seriously

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed!

jontsef 11-21-2004 11:29 PM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
He uses a different handle on PokerStars but he is one of the best high stakes Omaha Hi/Lo players on PS if not the best, and also one of the best limit holdem players.

Edge34 11-21-2004 11:34 PM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
It was funny, and I got a little chuckle out of it, but why support something that is hardly even original and will end up being about the least funny thing on the board before much longer?

Scooterdoo 11-22-2004 12:15 AM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
trump, toot... I'm sure he'll figure it out.

Scooterdoo 11-22-2004 12:18 AM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
guess I don't spend enough time reading these "funny" posts. I do remember Chris and Paul getting at it a few months ago, not much fun to read these things.

illguitar 11-22-2004 10:34 PM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
Can't type...peeing too much in my pants....If you read that with the Hulk Hogan voice in your head while picturing him looking at the camera....wait....what's that??? That's...that's Paul Phillips music!

Only to end with them having mutual respect for one another until one day Phillips is being interviewed by Jerry Lawler and HighStakesPro hits him from behind with a chair! And steals his manager/girlfriend the beautiful Miss Annie Duke!

Too funny man.

Daver

secada 11-23-2004 12:14 AM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
Good god. I have been away from the forum for a few months...What the hell has happened?

italianstang 11-23-2004 01:21 AM

Re: Paul Phillips, you suck and I could destroy you in poker.
 
Bret Jungblut is a stoner.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.