66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
 

Villian is 42/2,75/11 over 200 hands

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ Hero (6 max, 4 handed) converter

Hero ($24.40)
UTG ($27.15)
Button ($12.09)
SB ($80.89)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $0.10.
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Button calls $0.25, <font color="#CC3333">SB (poster) raises to $1.15</font>, Hero calls $1, Button folds.

Flop: ($2.75) 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
SB checks, Hero checks.

Turn: ($2.75) 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
SB checks, Hero checks.

River: ($2.75) 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $2</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises to $8</font>, Hero calls $6.

Final Pot: $18.75

Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
 

no, i wouldn't call, i'd 3bet.

Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
 

What hands that c/r there that I 3 bet are calling that I beat?

Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
 

any 2 pair hand that includes the case 6 (which, from the looks of the rest of the hand, is a likely candidate for villain's holdings).

oh, SB raised preflop... well, theres still a good chance he's slowplaying AK or something. You're only beat by a better set here, so I still think a 3-bet has value.

Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
 

[ QUOTE ]
What hands that c/r there that I 3 bet are calling that I beat?

[/ QUOTE ]

A-high [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

It's likely villain thought you were trying to steal this little pot and is trying to snap off your bluff. I'd definately 3-bet this.

Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
 

[ QUOTE ]
no, i wouldn't call, i'd 3bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
 

Good thing I didnt, as villian had KK and MHING. Its stuff like this why I suck at 6 max.

Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Good thing I didnt, as villian had KK and MHING. Its stuff like this why I suck at 6 max.

[/ QUOTE ]

eh.. moran slowplaying his kings.. 3betting will be the profitable play in the long run.

Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Good thing I didnt, as villian had KK and MHING. Its stuff like this why I suck at 6 max.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're being out-come oriented. Villain played this hand very poorly. It would have been funny, in a sad sort of way, if he'd won only $2 with a set of kings.

Personally, based on the way this played out, I'd have 3-bet all-in with this river, and the lost my stack. Then, after I finished swearing, I'd make a note on the fool and re-load.

Re: 66 Rivers a set...should I call that?
 

You definitely at least make this call. This particular Villian didn't start loosening up until he was over 100 bucks (I think I was sitting to your left at the table...buttom right)