Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   One-table Tournaments (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   LC: No Party at Party :( (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=355565)

ace_in_the_hole 10-11-2005 06:51 PM

LC: No Party at Party :(
 
On Sunday i moved $1500 over to party and started to play the $33's, I am now down to $900, I thought I was supposed to have the luck switch on at first so I would keep playing there. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Oh and here is a push check hand for ya:

***** Hand History for Game 2861994419 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $30 Buy-in + $3 Entry Fee Trny:16513041 Level:4 Blinds(50/100) - Tuesday, October 11, 18:46:18 EDT 2005
Table Table 66795 (Real Money)
Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 5
Seat 1: Pcarnera9 ( $2790 )
Seat 3: badbeats_com ( $1000 )
Seat 4: Timadator ( $1890 )
Seat 9: B_Gregory ( $1390 )
Seat 10: full_house83 ( $930 )
Trny:16513041 Level:4
Blinds(50/100)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to full_house83 [ Qd As ]
>You have options at Table 66964 Table!.
>You have options at Table 67327 Table!.
full_house83 is all-In [930]

I don;t care if Phile Ivey was playing these, there is no way he is winning, I have been sucked out on more than last week! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] But oh well, I am down to 90 BI and will drop to the $22's after 15 more BI drop which would be 45 BI drop total, I'm a loser in my last 350 $33's but I will keep on Truckin'. Holler.

KingDan 10-11-2005 06:52 PM

Re: LC: No Party at Party :(
 
Easy push.

10-11-2005 06:55 PM

Re: LC: No Party at Party :(
 
nm

10-11-2005 06:56 PM

Re: LC: No Party at Party :(
 
This was a very easy push here.

10-11-2005 06:57 PM

Re: LC: No Party at Party :(
 
It's a party for me. I've had 12 winning sessions in a row.

Slim Pickens 10-11-2005 07:27 PM

Re: LC: No Party at Party :(
 
I was under the impression that the best way to get Phil Ivey out of a tournament was to deal any random person at the table AQ. Give it to someone else, and the flop will contain at least one ace and one queen. Give it to him, and someone will flop a queen-high straight.

mike28 10-11-2005 07:55 PM

Re: LC: No Party at Party :(
 
Dealt to ggnextmap [ Ac Ks ]
Sovari calls [15].
drorgal folds.
ggnextmap raises [65].
moonie251 calls [65].
marjo123 raises [150].
jnye34 folds.
sheephead24 folds.
snoop_lbc folds.
silverimage1 folds.
richardhaley calls [135].
Sovari folds.
ggnextmap calls [85].
moonie251 calls [85].
** Dealing Flop ** [ As, 4s, 6d ]
richardhaley bets [150].
ggnextmap is all-In [610]
moonie251 folds.
marjo123 is all-In [510]
richardhaley calls [460].
** Dealing Turn ** [ Qc ]
** Dealing River ** [ 7s ]
richardhaley shows [ Ad, Jh ] a pair of aces.
ggnextmap shows [ Ac, Ks ] a pair of aces.
marjo123 shows [ Qs, Qd ] three of a kind, queens.
ggnextmap wins 200 chips from side pot #1 with a pair of aces with king kicker.
marjo123 wins 2155 chips from the main pot with three of a kind, queens.


Yeah the 33s seem to be infested with complete [censored] idoits. I decided to run some 33s to "get back into the groove" before hitting the 55s full stride again


Oh well, profitable in the end I guess

lem45216 10-11-2005 07:59 PM

Re: LC: No Party at Party :(
 
ace_in_the_hole
Do you make a note of how you go out of tournaments? I think this may possibly help your game or identify some leaks. I started doing this recently using the following method on my excel spreadsheet:
On all the Sngs where I make the money I hightlight those cells blue. Sngs where I go out because i played a hand badly that either knocked me out, or crippled me are red. Sngs where I've gone out but where i'm confident (based on icm) that i've made the right play but were just called by a better hand fair and square are green, and sngs where i've gone out because i was sucked out on are yellow.
If you do this over a longish period of time you'll see how your going out of these tournaments. Obviously if there are lots of reds you'll know something is wrong (you have to be brutally honest when deciding if you played it well or not). If there are lots of yellows and greens, it probably means you're just hitting a horrible horrible downswing and theres not too much you can do about it. Though you should consider the possibility that your pushing too loosely if you see lots of greens.

Anyway thats what i do and it works well for me. Let me know if you give it a try. Hope your on the right side of the variance soon.

-Jaffa-

P.s. the AQ hand is fine.

ace_in_the_hole 10-11-2005 08:40 PM

Re: LC: No Party at Party :(
 
I was actually trying to think of a way to do this becuase I want to know if my brain is broken or if I am running "IrieGuy" bad lately. So if I push AT get called by KJ Is that a yellow?
Or if I donk of 90% of my stack, I count that as the bustout obviously unless I come back and win! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Starting today I am implememnting this system. Thanks. Holler.

Out.

Hendricks433 10-11-2005 09:14 PM

Re: LC: No Party at Party :(
 
But the whole spreadsheet would be yellow... no? I think you need to check your game cause I think theres a reason your losing. Not Cause your the most unlucky person in the world. I am no longer reading your bad beat posts.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.