Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Internet Gambling (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   try this (OT) (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=358869)

GrannyMae 10-16-2005 02:51 PM

try this (OT)
 
Count the "F's" in the following text:




FINISHED FILES ARE THE RE-
SULT OF YEARS OF SCIENTIF-
IC STUDY COMBINED WITH THE
EXPERIENCE OF YEARS AND EFFING YEARS ...




scroll
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

How many ? 3?
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Wrong, there are 6 !!--no joke.
Read it again.
The reasoning behind it is further down.


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

The brain cannot process "OF".
Go back and look again.

Anyone who counts all 6 "F's" on the first go is a genius.
Three is normal, four is quite rare.




<font color="red">ENJOY! </font>

http://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/_950/creator.gif


(don't flame me if this has been posted before. i don't care.)

IggyWH 10-16-2005 02:54 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
So I guess I'm normal? That's an upgrade from what I'm usually considered...

MoDOH 10-16-2005 02:58 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
WTF!!

That was... weird...

jrobb83 10-16-2005 03:00 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
Thats freaking weird. After I read that it had six I went back and closely examined it and still didn't see the OFs.

Cubswin 10-16-2005 03:05 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
i counted all six... but then again i remember this little exercise from many years back. what do i win?

[censored] 10-16-2005 03:06 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
What's amazing is I knew it was a trick. I counted the first time and saw 3 going word by word. I counted a second time this time highlighting as I went through I got 3. I then went backwards right to left and that was the only way I could see 6.

toss 10-16-2005 03:15 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
WTF how the hell did I count 3 when theres 6. Freaky.

And I didn't just glossed over it the first time I read it too!

AA suited 10-16-2005 03:16 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
omg... another flaw i have [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

luckily computers compensate.

on 2nd try, ctrl-f for find, then type in the letter F, and i found 6 [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

droolie 10-16-2005 03:32 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
I got 6. I'm weird.

NateDog 10-16-2005 03:37 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
[ QUOTE ]
I got 6. I'm weird.

[/ QUOTE ]

pwned

GrannyMae 10-16-2005 03:37 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
[ QUOTE ]
Thats freaking weird. After I read that it had six I went back and closely examined it and still didn't see the OFs.

[/ QUOTE ]

me too. i needed the last bit of info. i'm ususally good at these, but this one got me. then i ran it by lorinda (math &amp; logic geek) and she got 3 as well. that's why i posted it.

http://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/k/dontknow.gif

GrannyMae 10-16-2005 03:41 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
[ QUOTE ]
i counted all six... but then again i remember this little exercise from many years back. what do i win?

[/ QUOTE ]


the warm feeling that your long-term memory is still intact. enjoy it while it lasts.

http://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/h0/dazdrool.gifhttp://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/h0/dazdrool.gifhttp://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/h0/dazdrool.gifhttp://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/h0/dazdrool.gif

DerFleischmeister 10-16-2005 03:51 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
This test is flawed. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

I got 6 the first time, having never seen it before, and I'm dumb as a post.

Wally Weeks 10-16-2005 03:53 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
I only found 3. It's interesting how our brains filter out "unimportant data." Taking articles out of sentences (i.e. "the" and "a") makes the sentence just as understandable. I suppose that's why some languages don't have these types of words. Then again, other languages have long-ass words to compensate.

DrPublo 10-16-2005 04:19 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
I counted 5...missed the OF in the last line. I guess I'm almost a genius.

But I also have difficulty reading off a computer screen so I tend to read very slowly and deliberately.

The Doc

Keith Fellmy 10-16-2005 04:25 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
wow. I got three...twice. I guess I am a dumba**.

sourbeaver 10-16-2005 04:30 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
[ QUOTE ]
wow. I got three...twice. I guess I am a dumba**.

[/ QUOTE ]

2x3=6=genius ?

jasonHoldEm 10-16-2005 04:32 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
Four...I only sorta suck.

Thythe 10-16-2005 05:06 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
[ QUOTE ]
I counted 5...missed the OF in the last line. I guess I'm almost a genius.

[/ QUOTE ]

I counted the exact same 5, twice in a row. I finally noticed the last OF going letter for letter.

sthief09 10-16-2005 05:10 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
I have seen this before so I got it right.

can I be a genius?

NLSoldier 10-16-2005 05:18 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
I have seen it before and knew the answer was 6 and still couldnt find the 6th one until the 4th time i read it. waht does that make me?

teddyFBI 10-16-2005 05:25 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
wrong forum -- try OOT n00b

GMan42 10-16-2005 05:42 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
[ QUOTE ]
I only found 3. It's interesting how our brains filter out "unimportant data." Taking articles out of sentences (i.e. "the" and "a") makes the sentence just as understandable. I suppose that's why some languages don't have these types of words. Then again, other languages have long-ass words to compensate.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think the fact that "of" is pronounced "ov" also helps...Most people read it phonetically in their mind and just "listen" for the obvious F's.

GrannyMae 10-16-2005 05:58 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
[ QUOTE ]
wrong forum -- try OOT n00b

[/ QUOTE ]

still using the word n00b ? my neice uses that a ton. she's 11.

i don't post in OOT anymore. i think it is generally filled with a bunch of idiots that may think they are being esoteric and clever. however, they just come off as pedantic.

the ones i care to intercourse with generally post in the other forums i frequent, so i am missing nothing.

GrannyMae 10-16-2005 06:01 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
I think the fact that "of" is pronounced "ov" also helps

this is exactly right. that is what is meant by the statement that the brain cannot process it. even when you stare at it visually, the brain is ignoring it because of the "ov" effect.

u smart man
http://smilies.sofrayt.com/%5E/j0/glasses.gif

10-16-2005 06:16 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.

yvesaint 10-16-2005 06:28 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
i got 11

Myrtle 10-16-2005 09:24 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
If you read the 'words', you'll more than likely see 3 F's........

I you look for the single letter 'F', you'll more than likely see all of them......

I chose to look for the F's.....

It was a good choice.

[img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Thythe 10-16-2005 09:40 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
[ QUOTE ]
Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.

[/ QUOTE ]

This doesn't really work for a lot of sentences.

groo 10-17-2005 12:48 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
[ QUOTE ]
Thats freaking weird. After I read that it had six I went back and closely examined it and still didn't see the OFs.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, but you're in Tempe and you're probably a Sun Devil. It's expected that you'd miss little things. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

charlie_t_jr 10-17-2005 12:59 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
If I got 5 the 1st go around, will DS now respect me even though I'm a college dropout? (small state school, no less!) [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

pokerrookie 10-17-2005 01:15 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
[ QUOTE ]
WTF!!

That was... weird...

[/ QUOTE ]

1

danzasmack 10-17-2005 01:51 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
i counted 4 when i saw the 2nd of. that is awful.

Punker 10-17-2005 02:04 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
How do I bet on this on the internet?

RollaJ 10-17-2005 03:07 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
[ QUOTE ]
(don't flame me if this has been posted before. i don't care.)

[/ QUOTE ]

Werent YOU the one who posted this 3 years ago though [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
(j/k, dont know if it was you)

BTW......while reading this I know you thought of a red hammer [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Enjoy!

NanaAnna 10-17-2005 03:15 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
[ QUOTE ]
I have seen it before and knew the answer was 6 and still couldnt find the 6th one until the 4th time i read it. waht does that make me?

[/ QUOTE ]

Smarter than me... I knew of this, and still got 3 the first time.... [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

Overdrive 10-17-2005 03:31 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
Makes one wonder about how many other things there are in the world that our brains might be missing.

GrannyMae 10-17-2005 03:48 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
no, but i had posted the thing mackem posted with the scrambled words.

the OF test was new to me.

radar5 10-17-2005 03:57 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
3...dammit i'm f**king normal

Opps...I said bad word...sry

tigerite 10-17-2005 05:31 PM

Re: try this (OT)
 
20.. each 'E' also has an 'F' in it


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.