put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

hutz open raises UTG, folded to lil' in the CO who 3-bets, hutz calls.

flop: 7-8-9 rainbow hutz bets, lil' raises, hutz calls

turn: [7-8-9] 6 complete rainbow hutz checks, lil' bets, hutz raises, lil' 3-bets, hutz caps

river: [7-8-9-6] 9 hutz bets, lil' raises, hutz 3-bets, lil' says "why not?" and caps

Who had what? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

P.S. If you were a participant or observor in the hand, please hold your comments for awhile so others can play along. Y'all can make fun of us later. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

Hutz has JT, classic UTG hand (although it does not make sense to open raise with JT UTG), and 'lil has AT. I hope I'm atleast right about 'lil's hand, which is pretty obvious in my opinion, but as for Hutz, JT makes the most sense.

Hope I'm not way off.

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

I think HUTZ has T,T : LiL 9,9.

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

Y'all can make fun of us later.
They wouldn't dare... [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

My guess: Huts has 1010 and lil has a better pair(QQ KK AA)

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

hutz on AT

Lil on 88

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

AK v AK

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

It's obviously the ol' 55 vs. 55 chopped pot.

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

If the table was tight-aggressive at the moment, I'd say hutz took it down with quad nines over eights full. You both thought the other guy was hyper-aggressive overpair guy or full of [censored] representing the straight.

If the table had resorted back to the bizzaro 2+2 table full of crazed maniacs somebody either won with AK high or got taken to the cleaners by something like 44.

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

Any poster who uses Superman references is the man. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

But no, it wasn't a maniacal 2+2 table. Everybody seemed to be on their A-game and it was tight-aggressive to the extreme!

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

Tight, Tight, Tight aggressive. I was happy to take my 1.5 BB's home.

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

My 3-bet pre-flop was questionable. I just really wanted to play a hand against Hutz.

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

I'll go for TT vs TT.

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

[ QUOTE ]
hutz open raises UTG, folded to lil' in the CO who 3-bets, hutz calls.

flop: 7-8-9 rainbow hutz bets, lil' raises, hutz calls

turn: [7-8-9] 6 complete rainbow hutz checks, lil' bets, hutz raises, lil' 3-bets, hutz caps

river: [7-8-9-6] 9 hutz bets, lil' raises, hutz 3-bets, lil' says "why not?" and caps

Who had what? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

P.S. If you were a participant or observor in the hand, please hold your comments for awhile so others can play along. Y'all can make fun of us later. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Did you have pocket 3s?

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

I was playing legitimately tight-very aggressive poker, especially UTG. lil' was fairly new to the table but had only shown down quality hands to that point.

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

... and 'lil was getting a lot of those quality hands.

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

What surprised me is I put each of you on the right (approx) hands on the turn.

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

On the flop, when you called my raise, I assumed nothing.
On the turn, when you check-raised, I put you on a big pair.
When you capped the turn (damn), I figured you had some type of 10.
When you re-raised me on the river (damn again), I thought I very well might be screwed, but since I closed the action I tossed the last raise in.

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

K-5 off?

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

I thought you might have been trying to be cheekey, saying "what the hell" while knowing you had the best hand. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

Gee, Hutz didn't say the answer yet? I'll give it.

He had 10-10.

I had 6-6.

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

Thanks, lil'. I was just getting ready to post the results, so I'm glad I read your post first.

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

Yeah, that would've made you look dumb! Like 3 betting a tight aggressive UTG raiser with a low pocket pair.

Re: put us on hands -- 2+2 table
 

I concur. Hey, wait a second...