* NSFW *
 

* NSFW *

Re: * NSFW *
 

10, I like big [censored].

Re: * NSFW *
 

Nice ta-tas

NT

Re: * NSFW *
 

the [censored] look big and fake. takes down the package for me. i like her thighs though.

Re: * NSFW *
 

Very nice, indeed. Easy 9.

Re: * NSFW *
 

Clear 9

Re: * NSFW *
 

3 on the Tony scale

Re: * NSFW *
 

out of chicks i meet/know/have a legit shot with= 9.5

out of models, actresses, etc= 7.5/8

Re: * NSFW *
 

[ QUOTE ]
the [censored] look big and fake. takes down the package for me. i like her thighs though.

[/ QUOTE ]

I went with 9 because I couldn't determine if they were fake. If so she drops to a 7 perhaps 6.5 because I didn't really look at her face.

Re: * NSFW *
 

I voted ten, but upon further review I'd like to change my vote to a nine.

Re: * NSFW *
 

there appears to be an arc-shaped scar on the front of her right tit

Re: * NSFW *
 

Stage right?

WTF???
 

For all you who probably didn't see Dynasty's post (because he quickly deleted it!):

He said something along the lines of:

[ QUOTE ]
This thread better improve quickly, cuz I'm about to ban you for a second time.

Don't overexpose what is already a weak gimmick account.

[/ QUOTE ]

Then it seemed as though I was temporarily banned because I could not log on nor could I see any posts on 2p2. Only now, after deleting my cookies and history twice can I log back on.


WTF, Dynasty? I'm completely obeying all "the rules". As you can see even other mods are liking my threads (not to mention the rest of OOT). So, WTF?


Anyone else have an opinon on this matter?

Re: WTF???
 

i don't like the thread that much, i was just responding. if everybody made a post like this with 1 girl in it the place would be flooded/boring really fast. the only reason i find it kind of interesting is to see the disparity in responses/ratings based on breast size. i don't see a reason to ban you, but i wouldn't care if somebody else did. you're probably asking for it by "calling dynasty out."

Re: WTF???
 

I'm all for good gimmicks, but one you totally sucked the first time and got banned, you should have let it go.

Re: * NSFW *
 

smooth 7.

Re: * NSFW *
 

Someone posted this chick before and everyone thought it was a guy.

Re: WTF???
 

[ QUOTE ]
i don't like the thread that much, i was just responding. i don't see a reason to ban you, but i wouldn't care if somebody else did. you're probably asking for it by "calling dynasty out."

[/ QUOTE ]

same. I'm generally against gimmick accounts starting threads

Re: WTF???
 

[ QUOTE ]
i don't like the thread that much, i was just responding. if everybody made a post like this with 1 girl in it the place would be flooded/boring really fast. the only reason i find it kind of interesting is to see the disparity in responses/ratings based on breast size. i don't see a reason to ban you, but i wouldn't care if somebody else did. you're probably asking for it by "calling dynasty out."

[/ QUOTE ]



All I'm saying is that there's no reason to ban me here. For the record, I emailed Mat Sklansky who said it would be alright to "try again" - referring to the initial banning.

Not all threads in OOT have to have 2000 posts of in depth discussion. Some threads may be for quick, simple, leisure enjoyment.

Again, there are no grounds for banning this account.

Re: WTF???
 

[ QUOTE ]

WTF, Dynasty? I'm completely obeying all "the rules". As you can see even other mods are liking my threads (not to mention the rest of OOT). So, WTF?b]

[/ QUOTE ]

I posted and deleted that because I missed that you had included a link. I thought you had made a botched post with a poll and no picture.

You were not banned (at least not by me)>

Re: WTF???
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

WTF, Dynasty? I'm completely obeying all "the rules". As you can see even other mods are liking my threads (not to mention the rest of OOT). So, WTF?b]

[/ QUOTE ]

I posted and deleted that because I missed that you had included a link. I thought you had made a botched post with a poll and no picture.

You were not banned (at least not by me)>

[/ QUOTE ]



My apologies, then, for the overall misunderstanding.

Re: WTF???
 

This is weak. Gimmicks should not break character.

Re: WTF???
 

[ QUOTE ]
This is weak. Gimmicks should not break character.

[/ QUOTE ]

The gimmick account itself is weak.

All he's done is link a picture from a porn site. Why not do that with your own account?

Re: WTF???
 

[ QUOTE ]
Gimmicks should not break character.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm generally against gimmick accounts starting threads



[/ QUOTE ]


[ QUOTE ]
if everybody made a post like this with 1 girl in it the place would be flooded/boring really fast

[/ QUOTE ]




Points taken.

Re: * NSFW *
 

Pictures should be in threads. Links are unacceptable.

Re: * NSFW *
 

[ QUOTE ]
Pictures should be in threads. Links are unacceptable.

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think this is legal, even with the NSFW warning.

Re: * NSFW *
 

Decent face and nice tata's, but the rest is mediocre. 5.

Re: * NSFW *
 

her right boob is bigger than her left, no?

Re: * NSFW *
 

on the T4 scale, shes a 3

Re: * NSFW *
 

She's got her arms behind her head to keep the boobs from sagging clear out of the picture. So, 6 to 7-ish.

Awww . . .
 

Group hug ? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: * NSFW *
 

[ QUOTE ]
10, I like big [censored].

[/ QUOTE ]

This censoring nonsense is getting way out of hand.



Now we can't say THIGHS ?