How bad is this laydown?
 

PokerStars Game #3163450994: Tournament #15653383, Hold'em No Limit - Level III (25/50) - 2005/11/26 - 12:28:17 (ET)
Table '15653383 1' Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: goochman79 (1715 in chips)
Seat 2: little momo (2265 in chips)
Seat 3: Fresh8306 (1100 in chips)
Seat 4: 4OOZ (890 in chips)
Seat 5: lakeday (1320 in chips)
Seat 6: LadyAceHigh (1650 in chips)
Seat 7: Swatkiller (2045 in chips)
Seat 8: bogaras (1220 in chips)
Seat 9: hump68 (1295 in chips)
LadyAceHigh: posts small blind 25
Swatkiller: posts big blind 50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to little momo [Jd Td]
bogaras: calls 50
hump68: folds
goochman79: calls 50
little momo: calls 50
Fresh8306: calls 50
4OOZ: raises 840 to 890 and is all-in
lakeday: folds
LadyAceHigh: calls 865
Swatkiller: folds
bogaras: folds
goochman79: folds
little momo: folds
Fresh8306: folds

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

It's obvious. What the hell are you on? You're not the next Phil Hellmuth just for folding this, you should have folded in the first place and not limped in fact, but limping isn't as terrible as calling TWO ALL INS would be.

Jesus come on get a clue, this is a fold every time. NOT EVEN CLOSE.

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

I don't think limping is bad, if it's a passive table.

But there's no question about whether to call the all-in or not...

I would only call if I had a hot girl in bed waiting for me.... in fact, I might just check "post and fold" and logout.

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

I only said 'should', meaning, 'most times this is a fold'. Yes of course, there's the odd occasion when you should limp this, but I don't like it from MP very much at all.

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

This is an auto-fold, dude. You have a Jack-high!

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

[ QUOTE ]
I don't think limping is bad, if it's a passive table.


[/ QUOTE ]

yeah but if op feels the urge to call in this situation with an allin and coldcall ahead with his JTs then surely he should be folding rather than limping to avoid situations where he would otherwise donk off his chips.

but i agree, for someone that is postflop savvy i dont mind the pf limp with relatively deep stacks.

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

It's an easy call after the 2 pushes. Call it, get broke, stop posting.

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

Are you serious?

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

This isn't a serious question is it

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

Thanks I have a new name for my buddy list

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

Dude, JTs... that's like a Royal Flush type hand. And what about those TTT/JJJ flops? I can't believe you folded.

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

i haven't read any replies, but this is an auto muck. are you a gimmick account?

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

for kicks i tried to run this through sngpt, but can't seem to get it to work. it won't allow you to set it so you're calling more than 1 player all in.

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

Clear fold.

But, if the call of the 890 were putting the second player all in as well, then my personal decision changes to call.

And judging from my read on the OP(which I concede isn't based on too much), he isn't at the level where he should even be considering a call, but I guarantee for a player who knows how to utilize proper SitnGo aggression, calling the allins here wouldn't be nearly as -EV as you guys seem to think it is.

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Clear fold.

But, if the call of the 890 were putting the second player all in as well, then my personal decision changes to call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh jesus.

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Clear fold.

But, if the call of the 890 were putting the second player all in as well, then my personal decision changes to call.

And judging from my read on the OP(which I concede isn't based on too much), he isn't at the level where he should even be considering a call, but I guarantee for a player who knows how to utilize proper SitnGo aggression, calling the allins here wouldn't be nearly as -EV as you guys seem to think it is.

[/ QUOTE ]


bwahahahahahahahahahaahhaah rofl waffle

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

[ QUOTE ]
It's obvious. What the hell are you on? You're not the next Phil Hellmuth just for folding this, you should have folded in the first place and not limped in fact, but limping isn't as terrible as calling TWO ALL INS would be.

Jesus come on get a clue, this is a fold every time. NOT EVEN CLOSE.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: How bad is this laydown?
 

San Dimas high school football rules