Two Plus Two Older Archives

Two Plus Two Older Archives (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Hold'em (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   Bet/Fold River? (http://archives2.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=378728)

PSW 11-15-2005 03:12 AM

Bet/Fold River?
 
Party Poker 5/10 Hold'em (10 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx

BB is 60/9/.39 after 75 hands.

Preflop: Hero is UTG with K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
<font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#666666">7 folds</font>, BB calls.

Flop: (6.40 SB) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG+1 calls, BB calls.

Turn: (4.70 BB) A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG+1 folds, BB calls.

River: (6.70 BB) 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises</font>, Hero folds.

Final Pot: 9.70 BB

I working on getting the Bet/fold into my arsenal. Was it correctly used here?

psw

ellipse_87 11-15-2005 04:11 AM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
Bet-fold last-to-act on the River is called for when you don't hate being raised. Here I don't hate being raised because a bluff check-raise and slow-played Ace account for less than 10% of this villain's possible holdings, and I can fold TPTK with very little consternation.

toss 11-15-2005 04:13 AM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
Looks good. Villain's numbers indicate that he's rivered you with some wacky hand. Make sure you keep an eye on what he raises with though.

BoxLiquid 11-15-2005 04:41 AM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
I'm still a trainee.. I don't understand why we fold this on the river to a raise?

Also... why not a check/call?

If anyone can explain I will greatly appreciate it.

olavfo 11-15-2005 04:42 AM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
If you can't call a river checkraise, why not take a free showdown?

11-15-2005 04:44 AM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
I wouldn't fold based on these stats. I would fold if this is the first time he has ever check raised, or if he has check raised three times and showed down with 2 pair or better.

ellipse_87 11-15-2005 04:49 AM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
[ QUOTE ]
If you can't call a river checkraise, why not take a free showdown?

[/ QUOTE ]

Value. We have TPTK and it seems that the other guy likes to call a lot.

olavfo 11-15-2005 04:58 AM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you can't call a river checkraise, why not take a free showdown?

[/ QUOTE ]

Value. We have TPTK and it seems that the other guy likes to call a lot.

[/ QUOTE ]
I understand that, but you need to be very sure you are beaten to fold in this spot, otherwise you might be doing a terrible mistake. You need very good reads to bet-fold profitably here. Without such reads, I don't bet-fold, I bet-call or check behind.

I consider river bet-folding to be a somewhat dangerous practice.

BoxLiquid 11-15-2005 05:05 AM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
[ QUOTE ]
I understand that, but you need to be very sure you are beaten to fold in this spot, otherwise you might be doing a terrible mistake. You need very good reads to bet-fold profitably here. Without such reads, I don't bet-fold, I bet-call or check behind.

I consider river bet-folding to be a somewhat dangerous practice.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's true. There were many times I've been c/r'ed on the river to end up winning. How did you guys determine knowing to fold?

ellipse_87 11-15-2005 05:09 AM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
[ QUOTE ]
You need very good reads

[/ QUOTE ]

Villain is 60/9/.36 after 75. Do we need a larger sample, or lower aggression? This guy seems really passive. I can't see what he's check-raising that we beat. I don't think he's bluff check-raising 10% of the time.

toss 11-15-2005 05:09 AM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
Villains stats after 75 hands suggest he only will checkraise here with strong hands. 75 hands, although small, is probably sufficient enough information to allow us to make such a fold. Thats why in my first post I noted that Hero should observe what villain will checkraise and bets with in case the Poker Tracker stats are misleading.

11-15-2005 05:46 AM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You need very good reads

[/ QUOTE ]

Villain is 60/9/.36 after 75. Do we need a larger sample, or lower aggression? This guy seems really passive. I can't see what he's check-raising that we beat. I don't think he's bluff check-raising 10% of the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

True he probably isn't bluff check-raising, but from his stats we do know that Villain is an idiot. He might think he is slow playing a pair of aces. He doesn't think he is bluffing.

Nick Royale 11-15-2005 05:49 AM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Villains stats after 75 hands suggest he only will checkraise here with strong hands. 75 hands, although small, is probably sufficient enough information to allow us to make such a fold. Thats why in my first post I noted that Hero should observe what villain will checkraise and bets with in case the Poker Tracker stats are misleading.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm not sure how much these stats tells us. We have only 75 hands. He's aggressive preflop and since he's playing 60% an af of 0.35 isn't awfully low (even though I agree it's low). There's no reasonable hand check/raising this river that we beat, but our opponent obviously isn't reasonable judging from the number of hands he play. I don't think the af is an appropriate way of meassuring how likely a player is to be making a strange bluff and in my experience a player with these stats are more likely to be making a weird bluff than many others. I've also seen players like this check/raising AQ/AT here. I'm most often paying off this river, but I think it's pretty close.

What would be really bad though is to check this river through, since the river bet clearly has value.

Adam22 11-15-2005 08:00 AM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
i could never fold that. there are plenty of hands i could fold there but top pair top kicker against a total nut isn't one of them.

PSW 11-15-2005 04:18 PM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
So no one is worried about the flush here?

psw

Nick Royale 11-15-2005 06:03 PM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
[ QUOTE ]
So no one is worried about the flush here?

psw

[/ QUOTE ]
Of course it's a concern, but you only need to be ahead ~10%. The question isn't really how often he has a flush, but how often he's capable of representing it by bluffing or raising a weaker ace.

W. Deranged 11-15-2005 06:27 PM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
[ QUOTE ]
If you can't call a river checkraise, why not take a free showdown?

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a bad way of thinking that I hear a lot from opponents in live games as high as 20/40 and 30/60. The reason we bet is because there's value here. Not betting, in fact, is HORRIBLE poker. This kind of straightforward river value-betting is one of the single-most important factors in distinguishing solid-winning from break-even type players.

ellipse_87 11-16-2005 12:25 AM

Re: Bet/Fold River?
 
[ QUOTE ]
He's aggressive preflop and since he's playing 60% an af of 0.35 isn't awfully low

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
there are plenty of hands i could fold there but top pair top kicker against a total nut isn't one of them.

[/ QUOTE ]

This player is loose passive, period. A 9% pfr% doesn't suggest aggression. OP has seen him take 45 flops and has noticed nothing to increase the likelihood of a bluff check-raise here. Yes, folding will lose a pot once in a while, but you have to draw the line somewhere, or else you have a leak.

What numbers are needed to fold here?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.